Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 611
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Holla does it all according to sportsline:

 

T. Hollandsworth (0.00) pitches to

J. LaRue (.251, 0-for-2, hbp): Ball, Strike looking (95/fastball).

Old-Timey Member
Posted
So, some people saying Murton's still in the game and some saying he's not. So which is it?
Posted
Novoa is impressing me as the setup guy.

 

Hopefully he's finally figured out how to pitch in the major leagues.

Posted
Novoa is impressing me as the setup guy.

 

Hopefully he's finally figured out how to pitch in the major leagues.

 

Gotta get some return out of the Farnsworth trade.

 

Now all we gotta do is teach Novoa to tackle opposing players.

Posted
OK, then by lately I meant 7/15-7/17. That makes just as much sense as pulling 7/9 - 7/17 out of the air and then using :shock: to make it seem that it proves the statement false.

 

Tying trends to a calender month provides a common point of reference that can be used to avoid having one side manipulate the data to attempt to prove their pre-conceived theory.

 

That's great. Hollandsworth has 1 good game, and you want to call it a trend. Hey, that's fine.

 

Trends begin and end when they begin and end. This happend without respect to any fixed and arbitrary time reference. What you call manipulating data is nothing more than isolating a trend that your "common point of reference" completely ignores.

 

It was a two game sample, thank you very much. :P

 

I still don't think your 13 AB's prove anything, and definitely feel the :shock: was a bit much considering the sample size.

 

You imply that 6 AB's is too few for a trend but are claiming that 13 AB's is enough. Seems like a pretty fine line.

 

Yes, it's a 2 game sample size. I said he had 1 good game, and I stand by it.

 

You have my sincere apology for the use of the :shock:

 

Never mind was it implied. Concentrate on what was stated. The original assertion was that Hollandsworth has played "real well lately". I assert that he has not. A fine line ? Sure it is.

Posted (edited)

BOTTOM OF THE NINTH INNING

 

Novoa in to pitch for the CUBS

Pena popped out to first base

LaRue grounded out to third, 5-3

Cruz, pinch hitting for Coffey, struck out (called)

 

0 runs, 0 hits, 0 errors, 0 men left on base

 

           1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9    R  H E
CUBS       2 0 2 3 0 0 0 1 1    9 18 0 
Cincinnati 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0    4  6 0 

 

CUBS WIN !! CUBS WIN !! CUBS WIN !!

 

W: Williams (2-3)

S: none

L: Claussen (4-7)

 

T: 3:03

A: 24,311

 

Home runs: CUBS: Walker (5 & 6), Lee (29 & 30), Ramirez (22)

Cincinnati: Aurilia (9)

 

pitcher     IP  H  R ER BB  K HR HB PIT
Williams   6.7  6  4  4  1  3  1  2 104 
Rusch      1.3  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  22 
Novoa      1.0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  18 

Edited by Fred Hornkohl
Posted
The kid gets 4 hits and Dusty wont even let him finish it out? What a joke.

 

Wow... I just referred to him as a kid and I'm 23. :shock:

 

What are you talking about? The kid did not come out. He played the entire game.

 

No. Hollandsworth stayed in to play left in the bottom of the ninth and Novoa was inserted in Murton's spot.

Posted
OK, then by lately I meant 7/15-7/17. That makes just as much sense as pulling 7/9 - 7/17 out of the air and then using :shock: to make it seem that it proves the statement false.

 

Tying trends to a calender month provides a common point of reference that can be used to avoid having one side manipulate the data to attempt to prove their pre-conceived theory.

 

That's great. Hollandsworth has 1 good game, and you want to call it a trend. Hey, that's fine.

 

Trends begin and end when they begin and end. This happend without respect to any fixed and arbitrary time reference. What you call manipulating data is nothing more than isolating a trend that your "common point of reference" completely ignores.

 

It was a two game sample, thank you very much. :P

 

I still don't think your 13 AB's prove anything, and definitely feel the :shock: was a bit much considering the sample size.

 

You imply that 6 AB's is too few for a trend but are claiming that 13 AB's is enough. Seems like a pretty fine line.

 

Yes, it's a 2 game sample size. I said he had 1 good game, and I stand by it.

 

You have my sincere apology for the use of the :shock:

 

Never mind was it implied. Concentrate on what was stated. The original assertion was that Hollandsworth has played "real well lately". I assert that he has not. A fine line ? Sure it is.

 

Fair enough.

 

BTW, keep up the good work on the worthless stats before each game!

 

Love 'em! :thumleft:

Posted

Cubs now improve to 47-0 when outscoring thier opponent this year.

 

And I'm not rooting for the Braves or the Nats. I'm just rooting for the Cubs to win the WC.

Posted
Cubs now improve to 47-0 when outscoring thier opponent this year.

 

:lol: Giving Fred a run for his money in the stat keeping department, aren't you?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...