Week 13: BEARS vs. Green Bay Packers @ 1 or something

[raw]

Bengals are in an interesting spot. Boyd probably walks after 2023 when his deal is up. Don't HAVE to pay Higgins until after that, but then you have to pay Burrow and Chase. I don't see them paying 2 WRs 20M+. Chase may hit 30Mil territory and Burrow 50-60Mil. I wish the Bears could have waited to see what they do with Higgins this offseason (also Jeudy and Broncos), but that could have also been an issue because those guys will go for a #1, and the Bears aren't trading a top 5 for them. So would have had to make a draft slot trade before entertaining that idea.

[UMFan83]

thought this was an interesting take:

 

[WrigleyField 22]

thought this was an interesting take:

 

I'm okay if he, Borom, and Leatherwood are the 2-4 tackle spots (plus Borom and Leatherwood can also prob bump inside as backups). I want them to sign a legit veteran tackle (Right or Left side doesn't matter IMO)

[minnesotacubsfan]

thought this was an interesting take:

 

I'm okay if he, Borom, and Leatherwood are the 2-4 tackle spots (plus Borom and Leatherwood can also prob bump inside as backups). I want them to sign a legit veteran tackle (Right or Left side doesn't matter IMO)

 

I'd rather they focus their attention on the interior O-line

[gflore34]

thought this was an interesting take:

 

I'm okay if he, Borom, and Leatherwood are the 2-4 tackle spots (plus Borom and Leatherwood can also prob bump inside as backups). I want them to sign a legit veteran tackle (Right or Left side doesn't matter IMO)

 

I'd rather they focus their attention on the interior O-line

 

Competency at C would have a big positive impact on the whole line.

[WrigleyField 22]

thought this was an interesting take:

 

I'm okay if he, Borom, and Leatherwood are the 2-4 tackle spots (plus Borom and Leatherwood can also prob bump inside as backups). I want them to sign a legit veteran tackle (Right or Left side doesn't matter IMO)

 

I'd rather they focus their attention on the interior O-line

Why not both

[minnesotacubsfan]

I'm okay if he, Borom, and Leatherwood are the 2-4 tackle spots (plus Borom and Leatherwood can also prob bump inside as backups). I want them to sign a legit veteran tackle (Right or Left side doesn't matter IMO)

 

I'd rather they focus their attention on the interior O-line

Why not both

Sure. But interior first

[minnesotacubsfan]

I'm okay if he, Borom, and Leatherwood are the 2-4 tackle spots (plus Borom and Leatherwood can also prob bump inside as backups). I want them to sign a legit veteran tackle (Right or Left side doesn't matter IMO)

 

I'd rather they focus their attention on the interior O-line

 

Competency at C would have a big positive impact on the whole line.

Sure, I'm being a homer but he is the best C in the draft and would be awesome for the Bears to use that late 2nd on:

 

https://draftscout.com/dsprofile.php?PlayerId=1023228&DraftYear=2023

[WrigleyField 22]

 

I'd rather they focus their attention on the interior O-line

Why not both

Sure. But interior first

They have a bazillion dollars, they better prioritize them both at the same time.

[minnesotacubsfan]

I forget how much money they have. Sure, both. Same time. Payne too while he's at it. Get 3 horsefeathering red phones and dial them all at once. Better get him some interns to work their fingers on the rotary dial!

[jersey cubs fan]

I think the packers game thread has run its course

 

viewtopic.php?f=44&t=4641&start=100

[UMFan83]

 

Meaningless info because bad teams lose 1 score games because they’re bad as much as they lose them because of poor luck but interesting to see

[WrigleyField 22]

 

Meaningless info because bad teams lose 1 score games because they’re bad as much as they lose them because of poor luck but interesting to see

Yea. Something like "if every team won 50% of their 1 score games is less interesting, but mor informative.

 

Or just run expected W-L off point differential.

 

In any case, Vikings are a fraud 10 win team. Everything else is kinda whatever.