Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
How many times this year have the Cubs entered the 9th with a big lead and Morrow ends up having to come in because the selected reliever shits the bed?
  • Replies 195
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
So, with today's results the Cubs have SEVEN players with 2.0 WAR or more in less than 81 games.

 

Plus three other players with at least 200 PA and an OBP of at least .340.

 

Also, a backup catcher who has given up more runs pitching than his RBIs + runs hitting.

Posted
Actually a smart move by Happ not to involve Gimenez.

 

You posit that Giminez is trying to sabotage the team. I have no counter-argument.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Morrow now unavailable tomorrow because Maddon doesn't want him going 3 days in a row

 

 

 

 

/only slightly joking

 

7 pitches the past two days, and I wouldn't be surprised.

Posted
422 feet, my ass, on the Schwarber dong.

 

Courtesy of CubmanPi but if you look at the replay of the Russell home run, it said projected distance of 339 feet, which is interesting because the wall in left is 355 feet.

Posted
422 feet, my ass, on the Schwarber dong.

 

Courtesy of CubmanPi but if you look at the replay of the Russell home run, it said projected distance of 339 feet, which is interesting because the wall in left is 355 feet.

 

I'm fairly positive StatCast doesn't include wind.

Posted
422 feet, my ass, on the Schwarber dong.

 

Courtesy of CubmanPi but if you look at the replay of the Russell home run, it said projected distance of 339 feet, which is interesting because the wall in left is 355 feet.

 

I'm fairly positive StatCast doesn't include wind.

 

Nope. It also doesn't include spin. That one probably had a good amount of backspin based off of how long it hung in the air. A lot of back spin, way up in the air, plus that wind, and it easily went further than 339. Probably the same on Schwarber's.

 

The projected distance is only based off of launch angle and exit velocity. So you'll sometimes see balls with the same projected distances travel different distances -- even in domes, depending on if the ball had backspin or side spin and how much.

Posted
Addy made some comments early in the season about focusing on using the middle of the field more and he's had a lot of oppo swings this year where he thought he got all of it only to watch it die at the track. It's good to see him pull the ball again, even if today's homer was a cheapie. His last 40 games have been really good.
Posted

Statcast does measure spin on batted balls, but it isn't included in the data they provide, unless you download all of the data on a play. I'm not sure why. Maybe it's because spin is more random and has to do with a variety of factors, such as which pitch was thrown and where it was thrown?

 

Also the spin will benefit a batted ball differently depending on the wind. So it's not as pertinent as launch angle and exit velocity?

Posted
Justin Wilson sucks and we always had the right to hate him

 

So I don't care how well he does the rest of the season -- I don't trust him and I don't want him on the playoff roster.

 

Honestly, I wouldn't mind if we just traded him to clear up a roster spot. We can trade for someone better next month.

Posted

 

Courtesy of CubmanPi but if you look at the replay of the Russell home run, it said projected distance of 339 feet, which is interesting because the wall in left is 355 feet.

 

I'm fairly positive StatCast doesn't include wind.

 

Nope. It also doesn't include spin. That one probably had a good amount of backspin based off of how long it hung in the air. A lot of back spin, way up in the air, plus that wind, and it easily went further than 339. Probably the same on Schwarber's.

 

The projected distance is only based off of launch angle and exit velocity. So you'll sometimes see balls with the same projected distances travel different distances -- even in domes, depending on if the ball had backspin or side spin and how much.

 

Well that’s stupid. I feel like it shouldn’t be that hard to figure out where the ball would land if stands weren’t in the way based on the full trajectory of the ball.

 

I wonder what the old hittrackeronline (RIP) used since we used to occasionally see huge differences in the home run distances.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...