Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
bryant doesn't seem like a guy who should contend for a batting title because he strikes out a lot, but then again mike trout doesn't seem like a guy who should hit .320, but he does despite striking out almost once a game (because his babip is like .370 every year). some guys just have a knack for hitting the ball hard and who knows, maybe bryant is one of those guys.

 

trout is insanely fast though

 

trout has been getting probably something like 15 extra hits (infield hits) a year from his speed, at least relative to a masher with average speed. definitely gives a boost to his average, but even if you took out those hits he'd have a well above normal BABIP.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
There's still people out there that think Bryant is going to hit .250 and OPS .830 in MLB aren't there?

 

I don't give a [expletive] how much he strikes out, that is simply not the type of player we have here.

 

Hit .250? Definitely could happen. Stanton has a strikeout rate around Bryant's minor league rate, and he's had a few seasons floating around .260 for his batting average.

 

Don't see the .830 OPS though.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Stanton's MiLB average was also 80 points lower.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
Stanton's MiLB average was also 80 points lower.

 

.420 BABIP is totes sustainable

 

And I thought I was being pretty generous by assuming Bryant would be able to keep his minor league K% at the major league level. It usually goes up.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Stanton's MiLB average was also 80 points lower.

 

.420 BABIP is totes sustainable

 

Trout's was .406, and Bryant is hitting home runs about 5x as often as he did.

 

The question is not 'Will Bryant's average come down?", it's "How much?" Especially considering he's done this at every level with an offseason in between, and his overall production is increasing as he escalates through the system, it's fair to think that maybe he's better at getting hits than a cursory 'K rate is high, his average will plummet!" look would indicate.

Posted
Stanton's MiLB average was also 80 points lower.

 

.420 BABIP is totes sustainable

 

Trout's was .406, and Bryant is hitting home runs about 5x as often as he did.

 

The question is not 'Will Bryant's average come down?", it's "How much?" Especially considering he's done this at every level with an offseason in between, and his overall production is increasing as he escalates through the system, it's fair to think that maybe he's better at getting hits than a cursory 'K rate is high, his average will plummet!" look would indicate.

 

Whether or fair or not, I'm pretty sure it's wrong.

  • 1 year later...
Posted
I'm surprised more people don't talk about Chesny Young. He's still young he's played all over the diamond this year. He's hitting for average and obp. There's not a lot of power but he gets on base at an incredible pace.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...