Executive Approval poll - Post 2013 Season

[Transmogrified Tiger]

Remember, how you define good job is up to you, just be consistent with your definition.

 

Past results:

 

Post-2013 Trade Deadline - 98% - 46 votes

Spring Training 2013 - 100% - 40 votes

Post-2012 Season - 84% - 31 votes

Post-2012 Trade Deadline - 90% Yes - 42 Votes

Opening Day 2012 - 87% Yes - 31 Votes

[Sammy Sofa]

I think they're doing a good job despite the incompetence of the people who actually own the organization.

[Boris]

They are playing a smart game and doing just fine. This organization is simply gonna need some good luck. That's the wild card.

[pitchcs]

Yes, I mean how could you say no?

 

1) A top 3 farm system in less than 2 years

 

2) They weren't hesitant to fire a manager they didn't feel was the right fit after 2 seasons

[Hairyducked Idiot]

1) A top 3 farm system in less than 2 years

 

Given the level of resource commitment to that farm system, that's basically a par.

[pitchcs]

1) A top 3 farm system in less than 2 years

 

Given the level of resource commitment to that farm system, that's basically a par.

 

So you voted no?

 

Good for you.

[Hairyducked Idiot]

1) A top 3 farm system in less than 2 years

 

Given the level of resource commitment to that farm system, that's basically a par.

 

So you voted no?

 

Good for you.

 

Well, your argument didn't exactly sell me on "yes," let's put it that way.

[SouthSideRyan]

Yes, I mean how could you say no?

 

1) A top 3 farm system in less than 2 years

 

2) They weren't hesitant to fire a manager they didn't feel was the right fit after 2 seasons

 

I voted yes, but to imply it's impossible to say no is silly. You could lead with 197 losses over 2 seasons and quite unlikely to compete in season 3.

[Hairyducked Idiot]

Yes, I mean how could you say no?

 

1) A top 3 farm system in less than 2 years

 

2) They weren't hesitant to fire a manager they didn't feel was the right fit after 2 seasons

 

I voted yes, but to imply it's impossible to say no is silly. You could lead with 197 losses over 2 seasons and quite unlikely to compete in season 3.

 

Screwed up Castro. Wasted a lot of money on bad and hurt pitching last season. Failed at their first attempt to hire a manager.

 

There's enough to plausibly vote either way.

[Sammy Sofa]

Yes, I mean how could you say no?

 

1) A top 3 farm system in less than 2 years

 

2) They weren't hesitant to fire a manager they didn't feel was the right fit after 2 seasons

 

I voted yes, but to imply it's impossible to say no is silly.

 

Yeah, this. I love the direction the farm has gone, but really...

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu1JMbSLPvc

 

I voted "yes," but I want a throbbing "YEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!" when those punks kids start turning into awesome major league players or get traded for some.