Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

Box Scores

 

Iowa won 2-1 Box Score

 

Tennessee lost Game 1 of its DH 11-3 Box Score (Continuation of Suspended Game)

 

Tennessee lost Game 2 of their DH 10-3 Box Score

 

Daytona won Game 1 of their DH 7-3 Box Score

 

Daytona won Game 2 of their DH 4-3 Box Score

 

Peoria won 2-1 Box Score

 

Boise lost 4-1 Box Score

 

AZL Cubs won 6-4 Box Score

 

DSL Cubs 1 won 11-10 Box Score

 

DSL Cubs 2 won 5-2 Box Score

 

OVERALL: 7-3

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest
Guests
Posted

Probable Starters

 

Iowa: LHP Brooks Raley (4.72 ERA, 4.50 FIP, 34.1 IP, 29 K, 9 BB)

Tennessee (game 2): LHP Eric Jokisch (1.42 ERA, 4.34 FIP, 31.2 IP, 10 K, 10 BB)

Daytona: RHP Matt Loosen (2.83 ERA, 4.08 FIP, 54 IP, 52 K, 20 BB)

Peoria: RHP Zach Cates (at Daytona: 10.50 ERA, 4.33 FIP, 24 IP, 10 K, 13 BB)

Boise: RHP Jose Arias (1.13 ERA, 2.05 FIP, 8 IP, 3 K, 0 BB)

 

I can't imagine Daytona's game is played.

Posted
The strikeout rates of the starters in the Cubs minor league system is atrocious. Man, they need some arms badly!

 

The DSL has some nice ones, but this is really the first seasons I've followed it all that closely, so for all I know it's more attributed to the free swingers of the league than anything else.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Looks like Jokisch just took over in the 3rd of the suspended game, rather than starting game 2.
Guest
Guests
Posted

Yikes, Jokisch got lit up.

 

Beeler starting game 2 for Tennessee.

Posted

http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/06/a-different-perspective-on-mlb-ready-prospects-rizzo-jackson-castillo-lake-and-vitters/

 

Not sure how many of you guys read CubsDen, but this is an excellent article on the progress/non-progress of Castillo, Rizzo, Brett, Vitters, and Rizzo. It breaks down their contact rates, pitch selection, and pitches per plate appearance extremely well. Very interesting stuff. Shows what some of these guys have been working on and whether or not they're having success at it.

Posted
http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/06/a-different-perspective-on-mlb-ready-prospects-rizzo-jackson-castillo-lake-and-vitters/

 

Not sure how many of you guys read CubsDen, but this is an excellent article on the progress/non-progress of Castillo, Rizzo, Brett, Vitters, and Rizzo. It breaks down their contact rates, pitch selection, and pitches per plate appearance extremely well. Very interesting stuff. Shows what some of these guys have been working on and whether or not they're having success at it.

 

Vitters' O-swing% is very surprising to me.

 

The numbers in the article are interesting. The analysis? Meh, he seems to be just eyeballing and saying "this feels about right."

Posted
http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/06/a-different-perspective-on-mlb-ready-prospects-rizzo-jackson-castillo-lake-and-vitters/

 

Not sure how many of you guys read CubsDen, but this is an excellent article on the progress/non-progress of Castillo, Rizzo, Brett, Vitters, and Rizzo. It breaks down their contact rates, pitch selection, and pitches per plate appearance extremely well. Very interesting stuff. Shows what some of these guys have been working on and whether or not they're having success at it.

 

Vitters' O-swing% is very surprising to me.

 

The numbers in the article are interesting. The analysis? Meh, he seems to be just eyeballing and saying "this feels about right."

Agreed. Not sure that those numbers really support most of his conclusions.

 

Vitters O-swing% was the most surprising thing to me, too. It doesn't really bother me that he isn't seeing many pitches, if he isn't swinging at bad ones. Seems like the thing that people kept saying about Vitters is that he needs to learn the difference between a good pitch to hit and a bad pitch to hit. 7.8 O-Swing% seems like great progress in that regard.

Posted
The thing that really stuck out to me was Brett's contact on balls out of the zone. I wonder if he's getting fooled and most of his K's now are coming that way? Because he truly should never swing at a pitch outside the zone, looking at those numbers. Obviously, it can't happen, but those numbers are rancid, to go along with a below average contact rate on balls in the zone.
Posted
Wonder why they pulled him mid-game and not before or after when they've probably known the exact date they planned to call him up for awhile now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...