Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest
Guests
Posted

I'm good with this pick.

 

Now let's get some upside pitching with the supplementals.

Guest
Guests
Posted
all these guys are big dorks. it is crazy to think about what the minor leagues do to people to change them into the sorts of tools they are by the time they get to the majors.

It's the bonus money.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Wow, can't believe they passed on Appel. :banghead:

I'm glad they did. Not sold on Appel being a difference maker.

Posted
Wow, can't believe they passed on Appel. :banghead:

 

Why take Appel and destroy the rest of your draft when you can get Almora and still pick up some nice players?

Guest
Guests
Posted
Given the "lock" status of this pick for a while now, who else thinks we might have a below-slot deal worked out already?
Posted (edited)
We can only wonder what the Cubs would have done under last year's draft rules. Would they have taken Appel if they had an unlimited draft budget? Edited by Irrelevant Dude
Posted

Anyone have a full scouting report on Almora, i.e. 20-80 tools?

 

I've read "elite" CF defense, but does he really have 80 defense on a pro scout's scale? They tend to be pretty stingy with the 80s.

Posted
Wow, can't believe they passed on Appel. :banghead:

 

Why take Appel and destroy the rest of your draft when you can get Almora and still pick up some nice players?

 

Because the system needs pitching and he would have instantly become the best pitching prospect in the system.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Tim, I gotta admit now I feel more comfortable with Almora than I would have Buxton.

I can understand that. I would have been much more excited about Buxton's ceiling, though.

Posted
We can only wonder what the Cubs would have done under last year's draft rules. Would they have taken Appel if they had an unlimited draft budget?

If they had an unlimited budget again this year I think you take Giolito at 6 if he's there.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Given the "lock" status of this pick for a while now, who else thinks we might have a below-slot deal worked out already?

I do. Probably 2.8ish or so.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Wow, can't believe they passed on Appel. :banghead:

 

Why take Appel and destroy the rest of your draft when you can get Almora and still pick up some nice players?

 

Because the system needs pitching and he would have instantly become the best pitching prospect in the system.

I'd be surprised if they don't go heavy pitching with the next few picks.

Posted
Given the "lock" status of this pick for a while now, who else thinks we might have a below-slot deal worked out already?

 

*raises hand*

 

But he's also a very Epstein style pick. The FO have talked a lot about being "less wrong" than everyone else in the draft. To me, Almora has all the floor you could want without sacrificing ceiling. No defensive concerns, no hit tool concerns, no makeup concerns, no competition concerns. The only thing you've given up is elite power potential.

Posted
all these guys are big dorks. it is crazy to think about what the minor leagues do to people to change them into the sorts of tools they are by the time they get to the majors.

 

MLB draftees are so much the biggest dorks. Then you got bud who doesn't think today is all that special to get some nice threads on that fit him. King dork.

 

Cubs have CF of their future!. Where have I had that before and no this is not a dig on the curre t draftee.

Posted

Scouting Report: Albert Almora (OF)

Posted on 11 May 2012

BLUF: Polished high school player with long track record and tools across the board.

 

The Player: Albert Almora (OF, Mater Academy) – Longtime standout member of the USA baseball circuit. Has played impressively on the international circuit over the last 4-5 years. Committed to the University of Miami.

 

Basis of Report: Industry Contacts

 

Scouting Report

 

Body (6-2, 170): Very lean athlete. Needs to add some strength, and should as he reaches physical maturity. Good coordination and lots of fast-twitch ability. Well-proportioned. Very good athlete. Not a premium frame but has enough to carry his tools and project well.

Hit: Very polished approach to hitting for his age. Natural feel for contact with ability to adjust to the ball in flight. Uses the whole field. Generates line drives with a fairly generic swing. Has consistent moderate leg kick that he uses for timing. Hands can get out of sync with his leg kick, but typically work well together. Handles premium velocity well, despite lacking strength to consistently drive the ball with authority. Potential high-average hitter. Grade – 30/70

Power: Lacks power now but has room in frame for added strength and increase power output. Generally projects for average home run power with plenty of doubles. Swing doesn’t have tons of bat speed or loft, but both could increase in time. Power could end up weakest tool down the road, but still approach average. Grade (raw power) – 30/50

Arm: Shows above average to plus arm strength. Good throwing mechanics with consistent, quick release. Good accuracy on throws helps natural arm strength play up. Can add more zip to throws with increased strength. Grade – 50/60

Fielding: Very good defender right now. Plus-plus instincts for his age. Gets good jumps on the ball and takes proper routes. Aggressive defender that can chase it down from gap to gap. Potential elite defender up the middle with more experience, and easily projects for well-above-average glove. Grade – 60/70

Speed: Average or better runner right now that shows consistent above-average running ability once underway. Body type gives him projection to maintain speed and instincts should let it play in game situations. Above-average speed should be more consistent at maturity. Grade – 50/50

 

Summation: Very polished player for his age. Instinctual player in the field, at the plate and on the bases. Has potential to be 15-homer, 15-20 steal type that hits for a good average and plays outstanding defense up the middle. Needs improved physicality to reach his ceiling. Polish could move him fairly quickly through a system, but will have to catch up physically. May need some tweaks to timing mechanism at the plate to be more consistent against pro pitching, but that’s a minor change. Potential above-average up the middle player that contributes across the board.

 

Relative Risk: High. Lots of projection required with the body, power and even long term hitting ability. Polish is impressive, but still a risky prospect.

 

Draft Projection: Polish and track record on international stage may be pushing him up draft boards more than warranted. Easy first round pick, but top ten talk is a stretch for some scouts.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
We can only wonder what the Cubs would have done under last year's draft rules. Would they have taken Appel if they had an unlimited draft budget?

If they had an unlimited budget again this year I think you take Giolito at 6 if he's there.

Yeah, I think we would have went with Giolito. Don't think Appel would have been there if rules hadn't changed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...