Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
it doesn't matter what the recent precedent is, if a team really wants him, they will offer what it takes to get him. we hold the cards.

 

Recent precedent doesn't determine final price but it's a really strong indication that nobody should be expecting anything resembling a blockbuster. My guess is you might be able to get something like a decent WR and a 2nd or 3rd rounder, but a 1st, or a 1st and more is probably out of the question.

 

i doubt we're going to get a blockbuster, but maybe a swap of first round picks plus a 2nd rounder or something could be a possibility

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I want to see if they can get Santonio Holmes out of NY. He feuded with Sanchez which may make him seem like a jerk, but Sanchez is kind of garbage, and he wouldn't have the need to feud with Cutler.
Posted
it doesn't matter what the recent precedent is, if a team really wants him, they will offer what it takes to get him. we hold the cards.

 

Recent precedent doesn't determine final price but it's a really strong indication that nobody should be expecting anything resembling a blockbuster. My guess is you might be able to get something like a decent WR and a 2nd or 3rd rounder, but a 1st, or a 1st and more is probably out of the question.

 

i doubt we're going to get a blockbuster, but maybe a swap of first round picks plus a 2nd rounder or something could be a possibility

 

Who would be worth swapping with that would want him? You aren't getting into the top 4. Tampa could be interested in a swap at 5, maybe Washington at 6. Jacksonville, no, Miami, no. Buffalo doubtful, and by then there's very little point in making the swap for the Bears.

Posted
Yeah, Santonio wouldn't cost much, in terms of picks. Hell, they could release him. I really want us to explore what it'd take to get Marshall though.
Posted
If you franchise a player, don't you HAVE to get at least a 1st rounder back in return? Not swapping either, an actual 1st?
Posted
Yeah, Santonio wouldn't cost much, in terms of picks. Hell, they could release him. I really want us to explore what it'd take to get Marshall though.

 

If Miami was going with full regime change I could see it happening, but with Ireland staying on as GM I just don't think they will be looking to deal Marshall away so easily after the acquisition.

Posted
Yeah, Santonio wouldn't cost much, in terms of picks. Hell, they could release him. I really want us to explore what it'd take to get Marshall though.

 

If Miami was going with full regime change I could see it happening, but with Ireland staying on as GM I just don't think they will be looking to deal Marshall away so easily after the acquisition.

 

 

You remember what they gave up for him? Was it a 2nd?

Posted
Yeah, Santonio wouldn't cost much, in terms of picks. Hell, they could release him. I really want us to explore what it'd take to get Marshall though.

 

If Miami was going with full regime change I could see it happening, but with Ireland staying on as GM I just don't think they will be looking to deal Marshall away so easily after the acquisition.

 

 

You remember what they gave up for him? Was it a 2nd?

 

2 2s

 

 

4/14/2010: Signed a five-year, $47.3 million contract. The deal contains $12.5 million guaranteed, including a $5.5 million signing bonus and $6 million of Marshall's 2012 salary barring a league suspension in the first three years. 2011: $6.5 million (+ $3 million roster bonus due 4/2), 2012: $9.3 million, 2013-2014: $9.1 million, 2015: Free Agent

Posted
That's definitely steep, but workable, if they're willing to deal him. He's been there 2 seasons already, so they shouldn't expect for the same return. Plus, he probably looked better in Denver than he has down there as well. I wish like hell someone could decipher the cap well enough to let us know where exactly we are and what guys like Marshall or Holmes would count against it.
Posted
That's definitely steep, but workable, if they're willing to deal him. He's been there 2 seasons already, so they shouldn't expect for the same return.

 

I can't imagine what motivation they would have for accepting less. They need a QB, and he's going to help whoever that is just by being there as a weapon.

Posted
That's definitely steep, but workable, if they're willing to deal him. He's been there 2 seasons already, so they shouldn't expect for the same return.

 

I can't imagine what motivation they would have for accepting less. They need a QB, and he's going to help whoever that is just by being there as a weapon.

 

would have been nice if hanie was any good.

Posted
Santonio Holmes has been a me-first prick since college. PASS

 

He's also been a good WR since then. Bears haven't had a good WR since......

 

Bernard Berrian? Turns out he wasn't that good. Marcus Robinson? He wasn't really that good either. (ironically both of their careers plummeted when they went to Minny; go figure).

 

Maybe Marty Booker? Two really good seasons and faded into mediocrity in Miami.

 

You could make the case that you have to go back to the Conway-Graham tandem of the early-mid 90's. Conway only had two really good years with us, and a third with San Diego when he was 30. Graham was very good the two years he was here, but for some reason we let him go at age 27. He was ordinary with the Jets fir a couple of years (likely due to how crappy they were at that time) but very productive with SD during the final three years of his career..

 

I think the more interesting question is when was the last time we had a good WR who was more than a two year flash in the pan? You might have to go back to "Wild" Willie Gault, who we also let walk at age 27, and who in reality was more of a track star than a WR...but at least he was a major freaking threat. He averaged 21.3 per catch in 85', and 19.9 per catch for his career. He was probably the fastest player in the game at the time, and the WR position was very different back then (Andre Johnson might have been playing TE).

 

(Honorable mention to Wendell Davis, who looked like he was coming on before he had both of knees ripped to pieces by the stiched turf at the Vet.)

 

This as much an indictment of our offensive philosophy and QB woes as it is of the WR talent.

Posted
Dear GM Candidate:

 

I am writing with regards to the wonderful write-up I gave you in today's Chicago Tribune. I hope you will appreciate the efforts I put into blowing that smoke directly into your anus without any need for uncomfortable procedures. Please remember these efforts if and when you are hired as general manager of the Chicago Bears and I need a quote for a story.

 

Sincerely,

 

Dan Pompei

Posted
The Tribune has a way of turning writers I like into horrible journalists. David Haugh and Dan Pompei are examples of that. I'm very, very afraid for Brad Biggs and KC Johnson.
Posted
Santonio Holmes has been a me-first prick since college. PASS

 

He's also been a good WR since then. Bears haven't had a good WR since......

 

Bernard Berrian? Turns out he wasn't that good. Marcus Robinson? He wasn't really that good either. (ironically both of their careers plummeted when they went to Minny; go figure).

 

Maybe Marty Booker? Two really good seasons and faded into mediocrity in Miami.

 

You could make the case that you have to go back to the Conway-Graham tandem of the early-mid 90's. Conway only had two really good years with us, and a third with San Diego when he was 30. Graham was very good the two years he was here, but for some reason we let him go at age 27. He was ordinary with the Jets fir a couple of years (likely due to how crappy they were at that time) but very productive with SD during the final three years of his career..

 

I think the more interesting question is when was the last time we had a good WR who was more than a two year flash in the pan? You might have to go back to "Wild" Willie Gault, who we also let walk at age 27, and who in reality was more of a track star than a WR...but at least he was a major freaking threat. He averaged 21.3 per catch in 85', and 19.9 per catch for his career. He was probably the fastest player in the game at the time, and the WR position was very different back then (Andre Johnson might have been playing TE).

 

(Honorable mention to Wendell Davis, who looked like he was coming on before he had both of knees ripped to pieces by the stiched turf at the Vet.)

 

This as much an indictment of our offensive philosophy and QB woes as it is of the WR talent.

 

marcus robinson had the greatest season of any bear receiver ever. robinson had a pretty bad back injury while he was with us and he never fully recovered.

 

he was big and fast and he made cade mcnown and jim miller look good.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...