Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

I was looking at the standings today and some of these points really stuck out:

 

- Bos, NYY, Phi, TX combine for +530, and no other team is above +52

- Cubs are .5 behind the Royals in overall record, yet their run differential is 52 runs worse

- The entire AL Central is in the red

- The Padres are 12 games behind the Giants, yet trail in run differential by only 1 run

- Related to previous: Giants are 11 games over .500 with a -7 RD

- Detroit is 12 over with a -6 RD

- Min and Oak have identical records, but are separated by 94 runs

 

Is it common to see such variance? This seems a little ridiculous to the untrained (my) eye.

Recommended Posts

Posted
I was looking at the standings today and some of these points really stuck out:

 

- Bos, NYY, Phi, TX combine for +530, and no other team is above +52

- Cubs are .5 behind the Royals in overall record, yet their run differential is 52 runs worse

- The entire AL Central is in the red

- The Padres are 12 games behind the Giants, yet trail in run differential by only 1 run

- Related to previous: Giants are 11 games over .500 with a -7 RD

- Detroit is 12 over with a -6 RD

- Min and Oak have identical records, but are separated by 94 runs

 

Is it common to see such variance? This seems a little ridiculous to the untrained (my) eye.

 

The difference between San Francisco and San Diego is an interesting one. Both teams have great pitching staffs with crappy offenses, though the Padres enjoy the less crappy offense. ERA and WHIP are comparable between the two, though San Francisco has benefitted from much better defense behind the staff. Baseball Reference shows a pretty large difference between the situational pitching of the two staffs though. Yes, San Francisco's pen has been well utilized in high-leverage situations, but there is a huge disparity in WPA/leverage innings. Can someone with a better understanding of win probability for pitchers shed some light on why this might be?

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
Padres have a +5 Run Diff. and are 60-71

 

Tigers have a +6 Run Diff. and are 71-59

I think the Padres scored like 10% of their total runs in 3 games against the Pirates.

Guest
Guests
Posted

The whole NL West is pretty crazy.

 

Actual records:

Ari 73-59

SF 70-62

Col 63-69

LAD 61-69

SD 60-72

 

Yet the Giants at -17 have the worst run differential in the division.

 

Pythag W-L

Ari 68-64

SD 66-66

Col 65-67

LAD 64-66

SF 64-68

 

I'm sure it's out there somewhere but I'd be interested to know what the slimmest difference in the Pythag W-L (or run differential) is in the final standings in ML history.

Posted
The whole NL West is pretty crazy.

 

Actual records:

Ari 73-59

SF 70-62

Col 63-69

LAD 61-69

SD 60-72

 

Yet the Giants at -17 have the worst run differential in the division.

 

Pythag W-L

Ari 68-64

SD 66-66

Col 65-67

LAD 64-66

SF 64-68

 

I'm sure it's out there somewhere but I'd be interested to know what the slimmest difference in the Pythag W-L (or run differential) is in the final standings in ML history.

 

I know I should probably look this up myself, but is there a correlation between good pitching teams having better records then their Pythag numbers show? It would seem that the lower the scores allowed/scored would create more randomness.

Posted
Btw, why is Arizona [expletive] good?

 

Grit, toughness, and leadership shown to the players by old, tough, gritty white coaches.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...