Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Source?

 

And was he put on waivers or waived?

 

Put on waivers according to Sullivan.

 

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/ct-spt-0329-cubs-bits--20110328,0,5658997.story

 

Okay, that's a huge difference... not if another team claims him of course, but at least we're trying to keep him in the system rather than cutting ties completely.

 

yeah basically just a formality so we can send him to AAA. Not sure if anyone is willing to give him a spot this late in the spring

Posted
Source?

 

And was he put on waivers or waived?

 

Put on waivers according to Sullivan.

 

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/ct-spt-0329-cubs-bits--20110328,0,5658997.story

 

Okay, that's a huge difference... not if another team claims him of course, but at least we're trying to keep him in the system rather than cutting ties completely.

 

so if another team claims him, that team must put him on its 25 man roster?

Posted
Source?

 

And was he put on waivers or waived?

 

Put on waivers according to Sullivan.

 

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/ct-spt-0329-cubs-bits--20110328,0,5658997.story

 

Okay, that's a huge difference... not if another team claims him of course, but at least we're trying to keep him in the system rather than cutting ties completely.

 

so if another team claims him, that team must put him on its 25 man roster?

I don't think so, but the claiming team would then itself have to pass him through waivers before sending him down.
Posted
Source?

 

And was he put on waivers or waived?

 

Put on waivers according to Sullivan.

 

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/ct-spt-0329-cubs-bits--20110328,0,5658997.story

 

Okay, that's a huge difference... not if another team claims him of course, but at least we're trying to keep him in the system rather than cutting ties completely.

 

My bad, wasn't aware of the difference. Title fixed.

Posted
Yeah, and Jake Fox has 10 homers this spring. Ten.

Yup, and much like Jake, Max strikes me as more of an AL player. I know Boston had their eye on him at one point but I don't know what their 25th man situation looks like.

Posted
Source?

 

And was he put on waivers or waived?

 

Put on waivers according to Sullivan.

 

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/ct-spt-0329-cubs-bits--20110328,0,5658997.story

 

Okay, that's a huge difference... not if another team claims him of course, but at least we're trying to keep him in the system rather than cutting ties completely.

 

It's actually not a difference at all, in baseball. The terms are used interchangeably. If a player has been placed on waivers, he has been "waived." You may be confusing the term with a different sport: football. If a player is "waived" in the NFL, he becomes an unrestricted free agent (if he is not claimed by another team). Therefore, the term "waived" has the connotation of being released, in that sport. In baseball, "waived" = placed on waivers.

Posted
Source?

 

And was he put on waivers or waived?

 

Put on waivers according to Sullivan.

 

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/ct-spt-0329-cubs-bits--20110328,0,5658997.story

 

Okay, that's a huge difference... not if another team claims him of course, but at least we're trying to keep him in the system rather than cutting ties completely.

 

It's actually not a difference at all, in baseball. The terms are used interchangeably. If a player has been placed on waivers, he has been "waived." You may be confusing the term with a different sport: football. If a player is "waived" in the NFL, he becomes an unrestricted free agent (if he is not claimed by another team). Therefore, the term "waived" has the connotation of being released, in that sport. In baseball, "waived" = placed on waivers.

 

Good points.

Posted
The issue is that there are different types of waivers in baseball, and depending on what time of the year it is, saying somebody is placed on waivers tends to have different implications
Old-Timey Member
Posted
Source?

 

And was he put on waivers or waived?

 

Put on waivers according to Sullivan.

 

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/ct-spt-0329-cubs-bits--20110328,0,5658997.story

 

Okay, that's a huge difference... not if another team claims him of course, but at least we're trying to keep him in the system rather than cutting ties completely.

 

It's actually not a difference at all, in baseball. The terms are used interchangeably. If a player has been placed on waivers, he has been "waived." You may be confusing the term with a different sport: football. If a player is "waived" in the NFL, he becomes an unrestricted free agent (if he is not claimed by another team). Therefore, the term "waived" has the connotation of being released, in that sport. In baseball, "waived" = placed on waivers.

 

While I am aware that from a technical standpoint no difference exists, for better or worse the terms have evolved such that saying a player was waived is associated with unconditional release waivers. Assignment waivers are generally referred to as being placed on waivers.

Posted
Yeah, and Jake Fox has 10 homers this spring. Ten.

Yup, and much like Jake, Max strikes me as more of an AL player. I know Boston had their eye on him at one point but I don't know what their 25th man situation looks like.

 

 

Didn't we claim Fox off of waivers from Boston?

Posted
Yeah, and Jake Fox has 10 homers this spring. Ten.

Yup, and much like Jake, Max strikes me as more of an AL player. I know Boston had their eye on him at one point but I don't know what their 25th man situation looks like.

 

 

Didn't we claim Fox off of waivers from Boston?

The Cubs drafted Fox.

Posted
Yeah, and Jake Fox has 10 homers this spring. Ten.

Yup, and much like Jake, Max strikes me as more of an AL player. I know Boston had their eye on him at one point but I don't know what their 25th man situation looks like.

 

 

Didn't we claim Fox off of waivers from Boston?

The Cubs drafted Fox.

3rd rounder as I recall. If he's finally figured out how to hit a changeup, he could be a solid DH.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...