Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
At the risk of rising the ire of the SEC fans, let's keep the topic on the Big 10.

 

Oh come on, we should be talking about the Arizona program crashing and burning. It's fun for the whole family.

  • Replies 7.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
BTW one of the games of the year not only in the Big Ten but perhaps nationally as well could be each of Purdue's and MSU final season game. That is because they play each other and it may very well determine the champ. Unfortunately for me its at MSU.
Posted
At the risk of rising the ire of the SEC fans, let's keep the topic on the Big 10. Upon determining I can't have a 7 way tie for last place, this is what I've got for my preseason predictions.

 

MSU

Wisconsin

Purdue

Ohio St.

Illinois

Penn St.

Minnesota

Northwestern

Iowa

Michigan

Indiana

 

4 tourney teams, 3 NITs.

 

If Purdue does indeed finish 3rd it will be because they lose to teams other than MSU and Wisconsin. They beat Wisconsin twice last year and split with MSU. The one MSU loss was by three on the road and without Hummel due to sickness. With Purdue having essentially the same team back I can't see them losing more than 2 of the four and I think its just as likely they win 3 or 4 of them. With two losses Purdue should win the title. Last year they lost the title because they got upset late in the season by Ohio State. That's what will have to happen this year for Purdue to lose the conference and probably one or two more upsets for them to finish third.

Posted
At the risk of rising the ire of the SEC fans, let's keep the topic on the Big 10.

 

Oh come on, we should be talking about the Arizona program crashing and burning. It's fun for the whole family.

 

Yeah, but then you get mad when I tell you that we were the ones that sent Lute to the crazy house.

Posted
At the risk of rising the ire of the SEC fans, let's keep the topic on the Big 10. Upon determining I can't have a 7 way tie for last place, this is what I've got for my preseason predictions.

 

MSU

Wisconsin

Purdue

Ohio St.

Illinois

Penn St.

Minnesota

Northwestern

Iowa

Michigan

Indiana

 

4 tourney teams, 3 NITs.

 

If Purdue does indeed finish 3rd it will be because they lose to teams other than MSU and Wisconsin. They beat Wisconsin twice last year and split with MSU. The one MSU loss was by three on the road and without Hummel due to sickness. With Purdue having essentially the same team back I can't see them losing more than 2 of the four and I think its just as likely they win 3 or 4 of them. With two losses Purdue should win the title. Last year they lost the title because they got upset late in the season by Ohio State. That's what will have to happen this year for Purdue to lose the conference and probably one or two more upsets for them to finish third.

 

Yeah I highly doubt will finish third. Wisconsin lost half there team and won't be as good as last year and we beat them twice last year. MSU I'd say it's up to us and them for first, but I highly highly doubt we finish 3rd. We have the same team from last year we lost two players and neither started. Not to mention we also got a PG to make up for losing Krump. The guy was one of the top recruits in Illinois Lewis Jackson

Posted
Don't ask me, Mizzou has only mattered to me for 3+ years. It's much more convenient to refer that far back as the Michigan State days, especially for the purposes of hating on Illinois.

 

like the time msu put the banner up before they clinched and then had to take it down to share it with illinois?

Posted
Come now, can we all just agree that the college basketball world is a better place now? Why must we fight over this?
Posted
Come now, can we all just agree that the college basketball world is a better place now? Why must we fight over this?

 

Have we actually proven that Sulley will exist if he can't speak out against those speaking ill of the Illini? I like to think of it as a public service.

Posted
Come now, can we all just agree that the college basketball world is a better place now? Why must we fight over this?

 

Have we actually proven that Sulley will exist if he can't speak out against those speaking ill of the Illini? I like to think of it as a public service.

 

well, since that's pretty much everyone on this board, my existence is ensured for a very long time.

 

and btw, the overlooked fouls over the last 4 minutes of that game were just payback for 2001. they are still calling fouls on arch in that one.

Posted
Come now, can we all just agree that the college basketball world is a better place now? Why must we fight over this?

 

Have we actually proven that Sulley will exist if he can't speak out against those speaking ill of the Illini? I like to think of it as a public service.

 

well, since that's pretty much everyone on this board, my existence is ensured for a very long time.

 

and btw, the overlooked fouls over the last 4 minutes of that game were just payback for 2001. they are still calling fouls on arch in that one.

and we were more than paid back in full against UNC. What with Sean May having 0 fouls the entire game and James Augustine playing 5 minutes before he fouled out. Hopefully we can get back to that level before I die.

Posted
Come now, can we all just agree that the college basketball world is a better place now? Why must we fight over this?

 

Have we actually proven that Sulley will exist if he can't speak out against those speaking ill of the Illini? I like to think of it as a public service.

 

well, since that's pretty much everyone on this board, my existence is ensured for a very long time.

 

and btw, the overlooked fouls over the last 4 minutes of that game were just payback for 2001. they are still calling fouls on arch in that one.

 

I sending ill thoughts your way about the Illini ... whatchew gonna do about it?

Posted
Come now, can we all just agree that the college basketball world is a better place now? Why must we fight over this?

 

Have we actually proven that Sulley will exist if he can't speak out against those speaking ill of the Illini? I like to think of it as a public service.

 

well, since that's pretty much everyone on this board, my existence is ensured for a very long time.

 

and btw, the overlooked fouls over the last 4 minutes of that game were just payback for 2001. they are still calling fouls on arch in that one.

 

I sending ill thoughts your way about the Illini ... whatchew gonna do about it?

Probably beat you again at least once this year. So before you go thinking that Purdue was just amazing last year and that they are a lock to win the big ten. Remember they lost to us last year and we were about as bad as you could be and still be considered a D1 team.
Posted
Come now, can we all just agree that the college basketball world is a better place now? Why must we fight over this?

 

Have we actually proven that Sulley will exist if he can't speak out against those speaking ill of the Illini? I like to think of it as a public service.

 

well, since that's pretty much everyone on this board, my existence is ensured for a very long time.

 

and btw, the overlooked fouls over the last 4 minutes of that game were just payback for 2001. they are still calling fouls on arch in that one.

 

I sending ill thoughts your way about the Illini ... whatchew gonna do about it?

Probably beat you again at least once this year. So before you go thinking that Purdue was just amazing last year and that they are a lock to win the big ten. Remember they lost to us last year and we were about as bad as you could be and still be considered a D1 team.

 

You weren't that bad last year....You guys way underperformed and should have been in the middle of the big ten...Either us or Michigan State are a lock to win the Big Ten this year the rest of the teams are weak...

Posted
Come now, can we all just agree that the college basketball world is a better place now? Why must we fight over this?

 

Have we actually proven that Sulley will exist if he can't speak out against those speaking ill of the Illini? I like to think of it as a public service.

 

well, since that's pretty much everyone on this board, my existence is ensured for a very long time.

 

and btw, the overlooked fouls over the last 4 minutes of that game were just payback for 2001. they are still calling fouls on arch in that one.

 

I sending ill thoughts your way about the Illini ... whatchew gonna do about it?

Probably beat you again at least once this year. So before you go thinking that Purdue was just amazing last year and that they are a lock to win the big ten. Remember they lost to us last year and we were about as bad as you could be and still be considered a D1 team.

 

You weren't that bad last year....You guys way underperformed and should have been in the middle of the big ten...Either us or Michigan State are a lock to win the Big Ten this year the rest of the teams are weak...

Watching us every game, it sure felt like we were horrible. More than bad luck it was more an ability to find ways to lose. Either shooting 50% from the free throw line or playing Chester Frazier around 34 minutes a game, we were bad.

 

Oh and I still think Wisky wins the conference. I know they shouldn't, but they always overacheive.

Posted
Come now, can we all just agree that the college basketball world is a better place now? Why must we fight over this?

 

Have we actually proven that Sulley will exist if he can't speak out against those speaking ill of the Illini? I like to think of it as a public service.

 

well, since that's pretty much everyone on this board, my existence is ensured for a very long time.

 

and btw, the overlooked fouls over the last 4 minutes of that game were just payback for 2001. they are still calling fouls on arch in that one.

 

I sending ill thoughts your way about the Illini ... whatchew gonna do about it?

Probably beat you again at least once this year. So before you go thinking that Purdue was just amazing last year and that they are a lock to win the big ten. Remember they lost to us last year and we were about as bad as you could be and still be considered a D1 team.

 

You weren't that bad last year....You guys way underperformed and should have been in the middle of the big ten...Either us or Michigan State are a lock to win the Big Ten this year the rest of the teams are weak...

Watching us every game, it sure felt like we were horrible. More than bad luck it was more an ability to find ways to lose. Either shooting 50% from the free throw line or playing Chester Frazier around 34 minutes a game, we were bad.

 

Oh and I still think Wisky wins the conference. I know they shouldn't, but they always overacheive.

 

yeah, but that was there team with Brian Butch and Joe Krabbenhoft. They lost two of there three big guys. Butch was a force in the Big Ten. I just don't think Flowers and Landry will carry them to a title. They'll be good, but that's going to be tough with Purdue and Mich St being in there way

Posted
Come now, can we all just agree that the college basketball world is a better place now? Why must we fight over this?

 

Have we actually proven that Sulley will exist if he can't speak out against those speaking ill of the Illini? I like to think of it as a public service.

 

well, since that's pretty much everyone on this board, my existence is ensured for a very long time.

 

and btw, the overlooked fouls over the last 4 minutes of that game were just payback for 2001. they are still calling fouls on arch in that one.

 

I sending ill thoughts your way about the Illini ... whatchew gonna do about it?

Probably beat you again at least once this year. So before you go thinking that Purdue was just amazing last year and that they are a lock to win the big ten. Remember they lost to us last year and we were about as bad as you could be and still be considered a D1 team.

 

You weren't that bad last year....You guys way underperformed and should have been in the middle of the big ten...Either us or Michigan State are a lock to win the Big Ten this year the rest of the teams are weak...

Watching us every game, it sure felt like we were horrible. More than bad luck it was more an ability to find ways to lose. Either shooting 50% from the free throw line or playing Chester Frazier around 34 minutes a game, we were bad.

 

Oh and I still think Wisky wins the conference. I know they shouldn't, but they always overacheive.

 

yeah, but that was there team with Brian Butch and Joe Krabbenhoft. They lost two of there three big guys. Butch was a force in the Big Ten. I just don't think Flowers and Landry will carry them to a title. They'll be good, but that's going to be tough with Purdue and Mich St being in there way

They also weren't going to be as good without Devin Harris. Then without Mike Wilkinson, then they lost Alando Tucker. They just reload. If you want to beat them for the conference title you better be damn good. Like top 10 good. You may do it, but it won't be easy.

Posted
Come now, can we all just agree that the college basketball world is a better place now? Why must we fight over this?

 

Have we actually proven that Sulley will exist if he can't speak out against those speaking ill of the Illini? I like to think of it as a public service.

 

well, since that's pretty much everyone on this board, my existence is ensured for a very long time.

 

and btw, the overlooked fouls over the last 4 minutes of that game were just payback for 2001. they are still calling fouls on arch in that one.

 

I sending ill thoughts your way about the Illini ... whatchew gonna do about it?

Probably beat you again at least once this year. So before you go thinking that Purdue was just amazing last year and that they are a lock to win the big ten. Remember they lost to us last year and we were about as bad as you could be and still be considered a D1 team.

 

You weren't that bad last year....You guys way underperformed and should have been in the middle of the big ten...Either us or Michigan State are a lock to win the Big Ten this year the rest of the teams are weak...

Watching us every game, it sure felt like we were horrible. More than bad luck it was more an ability to find ways to lose. Either shooting 50% from the free throw line or playing Chester Frazier around 34 minutes a game, we were bad.

 

Oh and I still think Wisky wins the conference. I know they shouldn't, but they always overacheive.

 

yeah, but that was there team with Brian Butch and Joe Krabbenhoft. They lost two of there three big guys. Butch was a force in the Big Ten. I just don't think Flowers and Landry will carry them to a title. They'll be good, but that's going to be tough with Purdue and Mich St being in there way

They also weren't going to be as good without Devin Harris. Then without Mike Wilkinson, then they lost Alando Tucker. They just reload. If you want to beat them for the conference title you better be damn good. Like top 10 good. You may do it, but it won't be easy.

 

You got a good point, but I feel like last year we were just young and inexperienced and they were a bunch of veteran guys who like you said reload and get it done, but this year will be a year older and more big game tested that's all I'm saying.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...