Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I hope we see the same dominate Ted Lilly we saw in Cincy....He said he likes it cold, so welcome to Chi-Town Ted.

 

Is this turning into a running gag? :lol:

 

What?

 

Typing dominate instead of dominant.

 

What's the difference?

 

Grammar. "Dominate" is a verb. "Dominant" is an adjective. The initial post used "dominate" as an adjective.

 

I know. I'm just playing around. I like to piss off grammar snobs.

Good. Who cares if people get words wrong. why point out other's faults like that? I actually find it very rude.

Posted
I hope we see the same dominate Ted Lilly we saw in Cincy....He said he likes it cold, so welcome to Chi-Town Ted.

 

Is this turning into a running gag? :lol:

 

What?

 

Typing dominate instead of dominant.

 

What's the difference?

 

Grammar. "Dominate" is a verb. "Dominant" is an adjective. The initial post used "dominate" as an adjective.

 

I know. I'm just playing around. I like to piss off grammar snobs.

Good. Who cares if people get words wrong. why point out other's faults like that? I actually find it very rude.

i liken it to pointing out when someone has their fly open.

Posted
I hope we see the same dominate Ted Lilly we saw in Cincy....He said he likes it cold, so welcome to Chi-Town Ted.

 

Is this turning into a running gag? :lol:

 

What?

 

Typing dominate instead of dominant.

 

What's the difference?

 

Grammar. "Dominate" is a verb. "Dominant" is an adjective. The initial post used "dominate" as an adjective.

 

I know. I'm just playing around. I like to piss off grammar snobs.

Good. Who cares if people get words wrong. why point out other's faults like that? I actually find it very rude.

i liken it to pointing out when someone has their fly open.

It's more like being in a group of people and one person correcting your grammar or words in front of everyone. It's rude.

Community Moderator
Posted
Good. Who cares if people get words wrong. why point out other's faults like that? I actually find it very rude.

 

Typos are one thing. Continual misuse is another.

 

There are certain grammatical and spelling errors that make people sound unintelligent, and it diminishes the effectiveness of whatever point they are trying to make, especially when it's a consistent misuse, rather than just a typo. Dominate vs Dominant is one of them, IMO.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

 

 

I know. I'm just playing around. I like to piss off grammar snobs.

 

It's being a "snob" to just understand basic grammar? Come on.

 

I guess it worked eh? :lol:

http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/P/0671723650.01._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-dp-500-arrow,TopRight,45,-64_OU01_SCLZZZZZZZ_V47162198_AA240_SH20_.jpg

Old-Timey Member
Posted

According to Yahoo Sports:

 

1. Soriano CF

2. Jones RF

3. Lee 1b

4. Ramirez 3b

5. Floyd LF

6. Barrett C

7. DeRosa 2b

8. Izturis SS

9. Lilly P

Posted
I just heard Floyd will hit 5th and DeRosa 7th so Jacque must be hitting 2nd.

 

How do we feel about Jacque hitting 2nd? I was hoping that Murton would be our 2 hitter - ?

 

I'm fine with Jones hitting 2nd when Floyd plays.

Posted
According to Yahoo Sports:

 

1. Soriano CF

2. Jones RF

3. Lee 1b

4. Ramirez 3b

5. Floyd LF

6. Barrett C

7. DeRosa 2b

8. Izturis SS

9. Lilly P

 

this lineup was good for 6 first inning runs friday night....with that said...LETS GO CUBS

Posted
According to Yahoo Sports:

 

1. Soriano CF

2. Jones RF

3. Lee 1b

4. Ramirez 3b

5. Floyd LF

6. Barrett C

7. DeRosa 2b

8. Izturis SS

9. Lilly P

 

Dominate lineup, IMO.

Posted
According to Yahoo Sports:

 

1. Soriano CF

2. Jones RF

3. Lee 1b

4. Ramirez 3b

5. Floyd LF

6. Barrett C

7. DeRosa 2b

8. Izturis SS

9. Lilly P

 

Dominate lineup, IMO.

 

OK. Now I'm convinced it's a running gag.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I don't have any problems with the lineup. Jones if fine in the 2nd spot, IMO. I would rather have DeRosa there, but Jones if fine too.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
According to Yahoo Sports:

 

1. Soriano CF

2. Jones RF

3. Lee 1b

4. Ramirez 3b

5. Floyd LF

6. Barrett C

7. DeRosa 2b

8. Izturis SS

9. Lilly P

 

Dominate lineup, IMO.

 

OK. Now I'm convinced it's a running gag.

 

What? He's just asking for the lineup to dominate. What's wrong with that. :lol:

Posted
man ....wrigley is looking good...no kidding you like comin in here with cincinnatti back in the early 90's, lou, because you probably beat the swagger right outta the cubbies
Posted
According to Yahoo Sports:

 

1. Soriano CF

2. Jones RF

3. Lee 1b

4. Ramirez 3b

5. Floyd LF

6. Barrett C

7. DeRosa 2b

8. Izturis SS

9. Lilly P

 

Dominate lineup, IMO.

 

OK. Now I'm convinced it's a running gag.

 

What? He's just asking for the lineup to dominate. What's wrong with that. :lol:

 

He's not asking, he's telling, nay, demanding.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I wonder if Lou started Floyd because Cliff is a Chicago native coming home? I remember Len saying Cliff gave all his tickets he had to his mom and told her to deal with dispersing them to family friends for opening day.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...