Provide an example of a player who does get a lot of RBI that is not a HR hitter. In other words, you could say that about anyone. Nevermind the fact that he is on pace to have a second consecutive 100 RBI season. You're completely missing the point. I'm comparing him to other HR hitters and looking at the amount of AB's he puts the ball in play compared to other sluggers. It's simple, if he walks 120 times and strikes out 190 times, that's 310 plate appearances where he isn't putting the ball in play thus almost eliminating the opportunity to drive in runs. Now he's looking at having only 350 PA's per year to drive in runs. Many of those will come with no one on base, just like they do for every hitter. Yes he should get 100 RBI again, because he'll likely hit 45 HR again. Last year he ranked second lowest in RBI among 40+ HR hitters only one ahead of Bonds and it's very obvious why he can't drive in as many runs. Some of you refuse to admit there are any weaknesses in Dunn's game. Again for the 10th time, I'm not saying that he's not a good offensive player or that he doesn't create more runs because of the amount of times he gets on base. But when you have that many plate appearances with no contact, you don't get the RBI's that other sluggers do.