Why? They are 18 over .500 with a run differential of 98. Why can’t they win? How many more negatives do they have than any other good team. I have heard about the Phillies as if they are better than the Cubs. They have given up the same amount of runs and scored far fewer. So they obviously have negatives too. If a team 18 over with the run differential the Cubs have still gives you low expectations, what does it take to have high expectations? They are an elite defense and top offensive team. They added pitching at the TDL and have guys coming back from injuries. Why shouldn’t they be very good? Now, I agree, even very good doesn’t mean they win the WS. They probably have a 5% to 10% of that happening. Of course teams like the Dodgers, Braves, Rays and Brewers will have better odds at winning. But that is because 3 of them won’t have to play in the WC round. And most likely the Cubs won’t win the WS. Again, only 1 team can win. But that doesn’t mean they didn’t put a good team on the rules and that they don’t have a chance. I feel you negative stance is just a perfect setup for coming on later, when the Cubs do get eliminated, to say I told you they weren’t good enough. But any fan of any team can do that and be right 29/30 times. Even if/when they lose, it doesn’t mean they weren’t built to win the WS. They are, but so are other teams. Someone has to lose. Last year they had no pitching going into the playoffs, yet somehow beat the Padres and then took the Brewers to game 5. This time instead of staring Pomeranz maybe the start Holmes. Instead of following Pomeranz with Rea, maybe Brown comes in. Instead of having weakass Tucker up in a key spot, when he ducked the entire second half, they have Bregman up. I’m. It arguing that they will win. That would be foolish. I am arguing that they can win. And suggesting otherwise is just a default response to be able to then say “oh well, I said that would happen anyway”.