Jump to content
North Side Baseball

17 Seconds

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    23,892
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by 17 Seconds

  1. like who? the only clear cut one that i can think of is vazquez. you could make arguments for gallardo (he's had 2 really bad starts in a row now so his numbers are pretty even to duke's, despite having way more strike outs), jurjjens (1.27 whip to duke's 1.21 and a not so pretty k/bb), wainwright (1.30 WHIP to duke's 1.21) and pineiro (as flukey as it may be, he's somehow been very productive so far. he has a 1.11 WHIP) like i said, the only clear cut guy i'd put over duke that i can think of would be vazquez. the rest are pretty even.
  2. duke is having a really good season you guys. i'd have taken vazquez over him, but picking duke isn't that ridiculous.
  3. hopes: that they won't suck expectations: that they'll suck
  4. why do you want to bring in more terrible players? if we got any of those guys you'd be screaming for hendry to get rid of them after they have one bad game anyways.
  5. The June numbers look a lot better, but he still walked 6 and struck out only 3. I want to see that ratio improve. I wouldn't be against signing him and giving him a chance, though. Yeah, the WHIP is still too high, but I wouldn't worry too much. He's brought it down significantly 3 months in a row... so I would have confidence that it'll be lower this/next month. it's not hard to improve when you're that bad.
  6. he was letting go and taking huge rips tonight. the problem is it looks like it was hurting him i mean it was obvious they rushed him back. every time the cubs lost a game it seemed like his return date would be moved up a day. this feels a lot like the derrek lee injury in 06. he rushed back, sucked for a while, and then ended up back on the DL. i've be shocked if ramirez doesn't hit the dl again eventually
  7. So just to confirm, this was your opinion when we originally signed him and won back to back division titles right? Probably, yeah. Even when he was going good it was an awful contract and one most of us would have chosen to unload if possible. Btw, we would have easily won the second division title without him.
  8. He refused to take his position. I can't recall another player ever doing that. Yes, he finally went to left and found out it wasn't so bad. But, a player refusing to go to the position the manager assigned him to offends me. Maybe I'm wrong, but I just don't think that happened. He didn't refuse anything when push came to shove. No he definitely refused at first and eventually stopped whining and accepted it. I seem to remember it dragging on a while before he finally agreed to do it
  9. he's kind of right
  10. maybe he's feeling the pressure of knowing that this is his contract year
  11. wait, so now beane is a genius with trading used up pitchers....but only if they're a product of his farm system. in other words, he drafts pitchers who he knows will be awesome for a few years and then fall apart for no reason years later got it
  12. it's always good to get an opportunity to post this picture http://blogs.ajc.com/jeff-schultz-blog/files/2009/05/0829_large.jpg
  13. Yeah, my first thought was how weird it was to see an intra-division trade. I don't know if it's that weird when it's 2 established players of comperable value getting traded for one another. It'd be weird if there were stars trading teams, or a firesale trade from one team to another. When they play the same position and both teams are in the division race, it's pretty weird. This seems like a "let's make a move just to make a move and try to spark this sinking ship" type of deal
  14. Yeah Dan Haren and Huston Street are awful
  15. im assuming that promoting sandberg fits in with the "lose as many games as possible" idea
  16. that was a great post, but you know his reply is going to be something like this- it's funny because most of the time people aren't even arguing with his points, they're just telling him to stop bringing up soriano. he doesn't get it though, he just tuns it back into a soriano argument.
  17. umm, did you not even read my post? i said i liked fukudome there. jesus dude. you're trying to find ways to talk about soriano and it's pathetic. actually it's getting kind of creepy.
  18. So let's see. Fukudome gets moved to the leadoff spot and finally starts hitting again. He's doing awesome there and what does Lou do? Move him to third for no reason. Reed Johnson is awful against RHP, so what does Lou do? Bat him leadoff against one of the best RHP in baseball. This guy has got to go.
  19. that ho has a gigantic shnoz. no wonder she is crazy
  20. I suspect he WAS sleeping. Permanently. no he was dead perhaps he was just playing dead
  21. i don't doubt that, but i find it hard to believe the difference in defense is big enough to make up for a 100+ point differential in ops how is mark reynolds' defense? because he's outhit zimmerman by quite a bit also. so have chipper and even casey blake. zimmerman is actually right in the middle of the pack in terms of offense from qualifying NL 3B it seems like zimmerman got in because of his hot start and hitting streak while his overall numbers were ignored
  22. bucher is also saying it's not happening
  23. i'd like for wrigley23 to explain to me why we now have a leadoff hitter who has been hitting badass and drawing walks....but we still aren't scoring runs. i mean, it was all soriano's fault, right?
  24. unless it has ryan theriot as an above average defender, i'm not sold.
×
×
  • Create New...