That series was lost in Game 6 and only Game 6. Not the Lowell Game 1 home run because you don't walk the leadoff hitter in an extra inning tie game unless he's an MVP player (re: Bonds circa 2001ish or David Ortiz now), which Lowell isn't. By doing so you are just asking to lose the game. Look at the way that inning went: M Lowell homered to center. J Pierre grounded out to second. A Alfonseca relieved M Guthrie. L Castillo reached on infield single to shortstop. L Castillo stole second. I Rodriguez intentionally walked. D Lee walked, L Castillo to third, I Rodriguez to second. M Cabrera lined into double play, shortstop to second, I Rodriguez doubled off second. Ok. So say they walk Lowell. Pierre likely bunts him over to second. Castillo would still reach on a single to the shortstop which puts 1st and 2nd with 1 out. Then you have to pitch to Pudge. How do you know he doesn't come through like he did the whole postseason? You don't. The Cubs didn't lose the series with this game. The Cubs didn't lose the series with Prior throwing 116 pitches in Game 2. Why would that one game have any effect on him in Game 6 especially considering he had 5 DAYS OFF between Games 2 and 6. That's one more day off than he was used to having. Wouldn't you think the 113 pitches per start Prior averaged over the course of the whole season have the bigger effect on his arm? He only threw 3 more pitches than his season average. Now if Prior had averaged 90 pitches per start during the year and threw 120 in Game 2, then you might have an argument. I'm not saying that Dusty was right in leaving him in, and I think he definately should have taken him out considering the circumstances. But to say that Game 2 killed Prior's arm is ludicrous. Beckett shut down the Cubs in Game 5 and they didn't have a chance to win that game. He pitched unbelievably well at home in Florida so the Cubs didn't lose that game, the Marlins won it. Game 6 was what lost the Cubs the series. They had numerous opportunities to make things right. Whether that means Gonzalez fielding that ball cleanly or Baker having a reliever ready it doesn't matter. The Cubs lost the 2003 NLCS in Game 6. The Cubs didn't have a chance in Game 7. Sure Kerry Wood hit the homer that electrified Wrigley and tied the game. Alou homered to give the Cubs the lead. But the Game 7 loss was inevitable. Sure, theoretically the Cubs could have pulled the series out and managed a stunning comeback the day after an unbelievable loss. But that doesn't happen. The bottom line is that the Cubs lost the 2003 NLCS in Game 6 and the Marlins won the NLCS in Game 7.