81-1 with 10's Houston Harden, 90's Jordan, 20's Chicago DeRozan, 00's Minnesota Garnett and 70's Lakers Kareem.
EDIT: Just got Warriors Wilt and 80's Jordan as my first two spins but didn't get lucky after that.
It was a little funny seeing Arsenal having a parade for their EPL title 24 hours after losing to PSG. I get why, that they couldn't do it during the season because it was too close to the UCL final and then a lot of these guys are leaving for the World Cup. So they could really only have it today. But it's still a little awkward.
Gabriel missing the final PK …
Arsenal is just so boring. Them scoring so early was the worst case scenario because it allowed them to sit back and bunker. After 38 minutes they had completed 45 passes. That’s what Burnley does against peak Man City.
I haven't watched many Canadiens games in the playoffs, but I swear every time I have tuned in, they're getting outshot 2-1. Didn't they win a game earlier in the postseason despite taking like 14 shots?
Christopher Sanchez went 7 scoreless to extend his scoreless streak to 44 2/3 innings. It’s the 7th longest streak in the Live Ball era and the 11th longest ever.
i wonder how many teams have had a 10+ game winning streak and a 10+ game losing streak in the same season. I know the 2017 Dodgers did. But it can’t be that common.
You’re right about what is says about the East. And they got lucky Boston crapped the bed against Philly. But the East has been bad before and nobody has come close to doing this.
https://www.si.com/nba/playoffs/historic-numbers-knicks-winning-streak
The Knicks were +221 though 12 games. Second best was the 2017 Warriors at +196.
They were +212 over a 9 game stretch which is the larger ever in NBA history, regular and postseason.
This Knicks run is pretty wild. I think I saw through 12 games they had the best point differential ever in the playoffs through 12 games, better than the Warriors team that started 15-0 or that Lakers team that went 15-1. And nobody would have predicted it either. Only one win by under 10 points and both losses were by 1 point.
No I didn’t. I was strictly addressing the SEC not wanting to go to 24. Had no idea how lucrative the SEC title game was. Just figured more games would mean more money for all of them, which apparently it doesn’t. Was as simple as that.