(Disclaimer: I should have said, "Furcal would have a bigger impact on the Cubs, then Giles would have on the Cards, Angels, Dodgers, etc) I understand the man-love certain Cubs fan have for Giles, cause I would love Giles, but for a team that doesn't have a LEGIT leadoff hitter, Furcal will impact the Cubs lineup, if Chicago signs him. I mean people will say that well they believe Murton and/or Cedeno can handle the leadoff spot, to which I reply, "no you don't." Neither was asked to leadoff on a consistant basis in the minors, and neither leadoff in the majors. So you don't have a clue how Cedeno and/or Murton, besides Baker wouldn't put either in the spot, anyways. I'm not quite sure how a player with a sub-.350 OBP can be considered a legit leadoff hitter. I do believe that Murton could handle the leadoff spot. That doesn't mean I know he can, just that I believe he can. He's shown the ability to get on base, and he has OK speed. The Cubs have Todd Walker under contract. Walker's career OBP is the same as Furcal's. Walker's OBP has been HIGHER than Furcal's in each of the past two seasons. The only difference is that Walker isn't going to steal 20+ bases, which to me isn't a big deal. I'm not saying Walker is the ideal leadoff hitter. However, he can get on base as often as, if not more often than, Furcal. And he costs much less. I'm not saying signing Furcal won't be a risk, but people are forgetting that he would bring a dimension of baseball, the Cubs haven't really had in yrs.....a threat on the base paths. I personally believe that with ARam and Lee and maybe a third bopper, he could be coming into his own as a player. I'm tired of watching "wannabe" leadoff hitters, I want a legit leadoff hitter, something neither Murton (he is suited for the #2 or 6 spot, anyways) or Cedeno, IMO, will be. Furcal isn't going to be worth what he is paid, but he does fill a couple of needs, and IMO, needs are more important then wants.