Jump to content
North Side Baseball

UMFan83

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    95,284

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    73

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by UMFan83

  1. UMFan83
    Just my opinion 1. Cardinals 2. Brewers 3. Cubs 4. Astros
  2. UMFan83
    I still might given the current situation
  3. UMFan83
    Just for fun post relavent statistical predictions for the starting 6 (as I like to call them). I am just going to use WL (useless stat), ERA and WHIP Zambrano - 16-8, 3.45 ERA, 1.25 WHIP Lilly (will be slotted #2) - 14-12, 4.16 ERA, 1.41 WHIP Hill - 11-10, 4.63 ERA, 1.32 WHIP (will be inconsistant, great at times, bad at times) Marquis - 10-15, 4.98 ERA, 1.57 WHIP Miller - 6-7, 4.05 ERA, 1.30 WHIP Prior - 6-3, 4.58 ERA, 1.61 WHIP My prediction is that Prior will start the season injured, start the season in June, will miss another 2 weeks with shoulder soreness and be very wild but with a good BAA when he does pitch. Miller will also get hurt at one point, and unless Prior happens to be healthy at that time, Cotts or Marmol will get a few spot starts.
  4. UMFan83
    Not that they are necessarily correct, but I like to read the mlbtraderumors comment boards for each signing. The site sucks, but the comments have some logic behind them and represent the general view of baseball fans. Anyways, they seem to be unanimous in believing that the Cubs offseason approach was terrible and that the Cubs are a disaster and the best .500 team money can buy.
  5. UMFan83
    As the roster stands right now, assume slightly above replacement level players to fill out the bench. Also assume no Jones trade or any other major changes. You can also make your own assumptions as to the health and ability of key players (such as Prior and Wood) I say 75, my roommate says 90 and calls me a pathetic pessimist.
  6. UMFan83
    Prior threw up a 7.21 ERA last season. Marquis had a horrible year. Judging him based on that one year is silly. He's shown the ability to pitch far above his current contract in the not so distant past. I'll trust the scouts over statistical projections and internet GMs in this case. Prior had 9 starts, Marquis 33. Prior was injured, Marquis was reportedly not.
  7. UMFan83
    If you can't make a case for a PJ Brown or a Chris Duhon, how can you make a case for Sweetney, our only low post threat
  8. UMFan83
    I highly doubt the Bulls would want 'no practice' Iverson on a team coached by Scott Skiles
  9. UMFan83
    Whats the best possible player we can get from Jones, Marshall, Mateo, and a mid-high range prospect?
  10. UMFan83
    Good points. I have hope Larry will get him ironed out and Lou and Jason won't have a Lou/Dibble round two. I guess its just hard to accept 4.4 when 2 years ago we were talking about Clement and his high 3 ERA being our 4th starter
  11. UMFan83
    You drank too many rum and cokes last night too? More than enough. Definitely feeling the after-effects of it. Join the crowd. Holiday parties are fun
  12. UMFan83
    Well this signing guarentees that we won't have a terrible rotation next year, but at the same time we are pretty much certain to have a mediocre/average one with little shot at having a good one. That combined with no emphasis on OBP yet again on the offensive side, and we are pretty much locked into a 75 win team next year. On the plus side, having all these awful contracts on the team + a crappy season pretty much ensures the end of the Jim Hendry trainwreck. Go Cubs!
  13. UMFan83
    I don't know what to think. Miller signs here to start and now he has to battle with Prior for a spot. Marshall wins the 5th starter spot last year out of Spring Training and now he looks to be going back to AAA after spending almost all of last year in the bigs. Meanwhile, we have these mediocre veterans we just signed getting paid $7-10 million to pitch for us and blocking up spots in the rotation. At the same time, obviously everyone was wanting Hendry to sign backups for Prior and after the disaster that was the rotation in 2006, we actually have tons of veteran options so that we aren't throwing rookies out there to sink or swim. But why did it have to be Lilly and Marquis? This rotation is terrible and we will be lucky to win 75 games next year IMO
  14. UMFan83
    It's "only" 3/20 according to the link TXCubsFan posted above Again, the link: http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/chi-061209cubs-story,1,5103592.story?coll=cs-home-headlines
  15. UMFan83
    Wow, Hendry is really emulating St. Louis now, just like he did the White Sox last year and the Red Sox the year before. Power hitting OF to go along with power hitter 1B and 3B. 1 Staff ace followed by 3 mediocre to bad veterans and 1 young pitcher with potential.
  16. UMFan83
    Dammit...I was hoping the Cubs would get him. Good job Jimbo Edit: viewtopic.php?t=37209 http://www.northsidebaseball.com/PremiumForum/viewtopic.php?t=37209
  17. UMFan83
    This is so random. Did the Royals strike oil under Kauffman stadium or something??
  18. UMFan83
    From 2001-2003, Dotel was a dominant reliever. It's not like he's never had success. He's most likely a big improvement over any other reliver the Royals trotted out to the mound in 2006. The best reliever they had with over 50 IP this season was Todd freaking Wellemeyer. Yeah but hes still recovering from TJS. There were a lot of more dire needs they could spend $5 million on then Dotel IMO
  19. UMFan83
    My question is who is going to pitch for the WS NEXT year. Trading for the usual suspects (many of whom are free agents to be) won't do much good if you don't have the pitching to compete. Don't forget Dye will be leaving after 2007 and Thome is getting older and injury prone. 3-Way Deal? Sox get: Penny, Hudson, A. Jones Braves get: Garland, Fields, Loney/Kemp/Ethier Dodgers get: Aardsma, Buehrle, Braves prospect Could work out well for all involved. Not likely though. Could then try to spin Hudson or Penny for Tejada. Did you forget that Reinsdorf owns the White Sox? The Sox are cutting costs and are looking to get young and cheap players. Maybe Williams is going to go after one of the big names, but for them to add the contracts of Penny, Hudson, and A.Jones is incredible. Also, I'm sure the plan is to dump Crede's salary in the next year, so I don't think they would be getting rid of his young and cheap replacement (Fields). There is no way the Sox are trading Fields with Crede (in the form of Boras) looming
  20. UMFan83
    Yeah but the Tigers signed former All Stars like Pudge and Ordonez. Neither Dotel nor Meche are sniffing an all star game in their careers IMO
  21. UMFan83
    Is it? Hopefully his knees hold up. I don't think anything is a certainty with Bonds these days.
  22. UMFan83
    Dude who cares, hes not a starter, hes a $1million option off the bench. If Lee goes down, then you worry but seriously this signing is not something to worry about
  23. UMFan83
    Unless they want Freddie Bynum
  24. UMFan83
    Lets not get crazy. I don't think Griese can save us from having no Tommie in the middle, either. We get into the playoffs, where there will be good teams pounding the ball up the middle-------we're in deep crap without Harris. I think we just watched our Super Bowl dreams go down the toilet. a team capable of pounding the ball up the middle would have had success against the bears even with Harris. Maybe, but even more so without Harris, who has consistantly been drawing double teams from the O-Line all year long. Not to overreact more, but the entire D is likely to feel a ripple effect from losing Harris
  25. UMFan83
    ^^ Yes but it doesn't HAVE to go down. If Hendry is smart (and he's supposed to be) he knows that he has a good deal of leverage to work with. Jones has shown that he is unhappy, but he hasn't made any 'I will not play for the Cubs' comments. Hendry does not have to get rid of Jones. Furthermore, and more importantly, with the way sluggers are going this year price wise, Jones' contract looks extremely good for the production he put up. He should be able to get those teams into a bidding war, upping his value. But who knows....Hendry has done less with more before.
×
×
  • Create New...