Does anyone else think that the firm use of "Top 25/50/100" wins is kind of silly? I was just reading that NC State came into the week 0-8 against the Top 50, which was a major blow against its resume. But after everything that happened during the week, they now have 4 wins against the Top 50, which supposedly is a huge bump for their profile. But the teams they beat awhile ago (Miami x2, Texas) are still the same damn teams, but now ranked 48th and 49th instead of 51st and 52nd. I know you have to draw the line somewhere to compare 100 different teams evenly, but still there has to be a way to take those borderline top 50 wins into consideration.