Jump to content
North Side Baseball

UMFan83

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    94,552
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    66

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by UMFan83

  1. If you would have asked me before I read that, I would have guessed he retired 2 years ago
  2. So wait, its a righty starting and Rivera and Avila are both pretty good at throwing out basestealers, but Rivera gets the start?
  3. Doesn't Milwaukee torment Lester on the basepaths?? I think this was certainly considered for this decision Yes, great point.
  4. Before last season, anytime I wanted to feel pity about the Cubs history, I remembered that its still better than the White Sox, who have never in their history made the playoffs in consecutive years and only 9 times total in 116 seasons. This might/will be 19 for the Cubs since 1901
  5. So they could have started Lackey or Lester tonight, with the other opening the series against Milwaukee and they chose to have Lester pitch this one? We will still win the series, but Lackey, Montgomery, Arrieta replacement is a blah set of starters for the weekend. Any idea who will take the Arrieta start anyways? Rob Z?
  6. Speaking of the Mets, how are their fans feeling these days? Oh ok then, carry on. (sorry everytime the Mets are brought up I have an urge to see how Mets Refugees is doing for shits and giggles)
  7. I remember recently reading about Mike Trout doing it several times in his career...not sure if consecutive.
  8. The Cardinals and their +66 RD are definitely more formidable than the Brewers but making up 4 games with 23 left is difficult unless the Cubs totally collapse. If the Cubs play 12-11 baseball to finish the year, the Cardinals would have to go 17-6 to pass us. And even then the Rockies, with the worst record in the NL since the break, would have to go 15-8 to take any Cubs baseball after game 162 out of the mix.
  9. Also the dumbest horsefeathering series. Game 1 Duke injures Jake and we lose 12-0, Game 2 we blow an 8th inning lead and lose, game 3 we refuse to do anything offensively
  10. We got a solid single and 2 other ABs got to 3 balls, that's worth another 0.5 runs for the Cubs
  11. We got a runner to second that should count as a half run. Cubs are up 0.5-0
  12. Guys maybe we are supposed to use the other game thread
  13. Geez. This is like the 3rd time today I see the Pirates are done batting, I wait what seems like 5 minutes, check the score and the Cubs are already done batting. This offense is in some kind of fun the last few games
  14. Baseball is a crazy spot. One week you are going 5-2 against the Dodgers and Nationals, the next you are in the process of being swept by the Reds.
  15. So is ours. The main difference is they have 4 less against Milwaukee. Plus they have a heavy dose of Reds and Pirates. But, it's not like our 2 vs. the Rays and 3 vs. the Mets are a huge swing. Also, they are 4 back. Just take care of business and we got this. I think the 7 against Milwaukee and St Louis are actually a major advantage to us. It's very difficult to win 5 of 7 from a team. If that happens, sure we will be in some trouble, but most likely one of the teams goes 4-3 and the Cubs either gain a game or lose a game while burning almost 30% of the remaining schedule.
  16. Geez, the Cardinals schedule is pretty light Already played: 4 @ SF (3-1) 2 @ SD (2-0) Upcoming 2 @ SD 3 vs. PIT 3 vs. CIN 3 @ CHC 3 @ CIN 3 @ PIT 4 vs. CHC 3 vs. MIL I dont think they will catch us but they may make us sweat to the end if we continue slacking.
  17. The last time the Bears opened up the season against the Falcons at home: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sz8DHn1qX10
  18. i mean it's been said like 100x that sanchez wasn't really here to play, but to be a guy in the meeting room to mentor about what it's like to suck in the nfl and blah blah blah. his relationship with prescott last year has been brought up a lot too. i think it's a load of horsefeathers but clearly they believe he has value in that role as basically a coach under the guise of a fellow player. for whatever reason I hadn't heard that. seems stupid to waste a 53 man roster spot on a mentor but whatever.
×
×
  • Create New...