Don't hold your breath for a serious response to this question from some of the people on this board. what kind of response do you expect? it's ridiculous. he's asking for a stat that doesn't exist. no one said stats explain everything about the world and noone said they "base everything on stats." it's like he's asking for statistical analysis of love or hunger or something. So you do recognize that intangibles exist? I'm not trying to be a jerk or start a fight or anything, I'm seriously curious whether "stat-heads" believe in them. of course intangibles exist. but their importance in evaluating a major league player is absolutely, 100%, dwarfed by the importance of using statistics in evaluating a major leaguer's worth. anyways, i think every major leaguer has solid intangibles. if they didn't, they would have broken down and failed long before they ever reached the major leagues. the weak would be weeded out in high school, college, or the minors.