Of course it's appropriate. Don't be ridiculous. This specific situation is very far outside the norm though, and at its core involves issues that a) we're not privy to, and b) can't be boiled down to statistics. It doesn't fit neatly into the sabermetric box where you input OPS and WHIP and UZR and WARP and whatnot, and out comes your standard format thumbsup/thumbsdown answer. But nevertheless that's how some here have chosen to analyze it. almost all posters here realized bradley had to go. the 2 issues with the whole situation are: 1. bradley for silva is a bad, bad trade. 2. the idiot cubs fans blaming the 2009 cubs on bradley, and glossing over the fact that fontenot, soto, and soriano contributed to the 2009 cubs sucking a hell of a lot more than milton bradley did.