are you kidding? for starters, last year at the end of the season and this year to start the season. and a bunch in the minors. well, that's a dumb way to evaluate guys, but since you asked, hill has 9, marshall has 6. over the past two seasons, hill has 16, marshall 15. hill has has a QS in 47% of his starts the past two seasons, marshall 46%. apparently that's not the case. over the past two years, hill has put up era+'s of 111 and 116. marshall's career era+ is 91. even when you factor in his horrible 2005 when hill was shuffled back forth b/w the minors and the majors and the rotation and the bullpen, his big league career numbers are better than marshall's. i like marshall too, but hill's been better as a starter for the cubs and as a minor leaguer. and he's been healthier. and marshall is not really showing the same skills and attributes. hill has been harder to hit, he's walked fewer batters (surprisingly), and he's struck out a ton more batters.