Jump to content
North Side Baseball

abuck1220

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    17,742
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by abuck1220

  1. That's exactly how the system was designed! Did you notice the screw abuck factor? that would explain it. well, obviously ryan [expletive] jorgensen is going to get his first [expletive] major league hit by hitting a cocksucking [expletive] homerun against lilly and the cubs. any more starts for gallardo?
  2. anybody watching sf/atl? they're apparently letting junior high girl softball umps call the game...interesting promotion, but lots of people are getting ejected because of it.
  3. looks like i've ran into buzzsaw for the second straight week. i swear, even at this point in the season, i can't look at a pitching line and come even close to guessing how many points it's worth. all i know is that lately, whatever my guy puts up is between -20 and 4 and whatever my opponent puts up is 15-35. [expletive] you, mitre.
  4. with the help of his manager leaving him in way to long. agreed. he yanks hill or marshall w/o hesitation in the fifth/sixth inning, but for some reason he feels like z deserves to continue pitching when it's clear he's got nothing.
  5. Yeah, with a rotation consisting of Marquis, Hill and Marshall, it's critical for the Cubs to win Zambrano's and Lilly's starts. they at least need him to not give up a baker's dozen worth of freaking hits. pathetic.
  6. is valentin still behind the plate? if so, please send pie.
  7. just wanted to say that derosa's ab was pathetic.
  8. good thing zambrano's pitching because any fly ball to the outfield is probably going to be double.
  9. i need to win to have any hope at winning the division. if i win i'll be 2-0 against you, so i'd have the tiebreaker. of course, i'm up against a two start week from johan.
  10. no you don't. Correction: You want a closer that has stuff that is totally dominating. If you look at the best closers in history, most of them had at least one pitch (95+ mph fastball, splitter, etc.) that was nearly unhittable. well, you want a guy at every position that hits .300/.450/.600, but that doesn't mean you're gonna get it. plenty of teams have had success w/ less than dominating closers.
  11. can we send a certain 2nd baseman with him? .208/.303/.260(!) since the break. ouch.
  12. no you don't.
  13. damn, that had triple written all over it. i thought for sure fontenot was going to hold up.
  14. wow, how many times out of ten would that work?
  15. i don't even get what you're saying, and i really don't care. i said they weren't real good. he said they were because of a good 35 game stretch. i pointed to the other 80 games they've played as evidence that they're not...i'd say 115 games is a better sample size than 35.
  16. Not really surprising. No matter what anyone says, we're not a real good team. Take 2 top run producers out of any lineup and most teams won't be real good. they weren't real good with those guys. yeah, 18 games over .500 in a 35 game span (or something similar to that) isn't good. just overlooking the other 80 games are we? give me a break. Just ignoring the fact that the vast majority of good teams lose as many as 70 games in a season? what? let me know when the cubs go 92-70.
  17. Not really surprising. No matter what anyone says, we're not a real good team. Take 2 top run producers out of any lineup and most teams won't be real good. they weren't real good with those guys. Well 2-5 including a predicted loss today since Soriano went down (Ramirez played in one of those games). 58-51 with those guys i guess you and i have different definitions of "good." seven games over .500 doesn't do much for me...sorry.
  18. Not really surprising. No matter what anyone says, we're not a real good team. Take 2 top run producers out of any lineup and most teams won't be real good. they weren't real good with those guys. yeah, 18 games over .500 in a 35 game span (or something similar to that) isn't good. just overlooking the other 80 games are we? give me a break.
  19. that's one of those calls that umps make to make them look smart.
  20. Not really surprising. No matter what anyone says, we're not a real good team. Take 2 top run producers out of any lineup and most teams won't be real good. they weren't real good with those guys.
×
×
  • Create New...