Scouts are routinely wrong about a lot of things, and the whole point is that his value decreases as he goes down the defensive spectrum. You can say "the bat will play anywhere" all you want, but the position matters. Yeah, but I don't see him ending up anywhere further down said spectrum than 3B or 2B...so that bat (if it pans out - which is the only way he'd pan out as a player) is going to play really well regardless. If he ended up having to move to LF or something, that'd obviously be a bummer. And I'd like to think there's something to Tim's theory. Well then I think it is either disingenuous or a mistake to say you honestly couldn't care any less about all those errors. If you care about the guy's development, you should care about where he can play. And the bat playing well thing isn't a black or white scenario. There is a gray area where a lot of his weaknesses could carry over throughout his career with his talent/ability allowing him to stick. It's not like he's either going to be a superstar or flame out in AA.