If I'm being honest, Michigan and Ohio State are better examples. They are similar in geography, and obviously in our conference. The point wasn't the schools specifically, but rather their recruiting practices. People seem to forget that Nebraska is a blue blood program. It wasn't by accident that the following has occurred in our proud football history: 5 National Championships 43 Conference Championships 4th most all-time victories among FBS schools, behind Michigan, Texas and Notre Dame (who we are only 9 wins behind) 9th in winning percentage among FBS schools Winningest college football program during the last 50 years When I say I'm a homer, it isn't only because I'm from here. Nebraska is a blue blood program, and has the resources to compete every single year on a national level. I additionally don't expect that we will see a return to the Devaney and Osborne years - but I do expect to be nationally relevant and winning conference championships. This is Nebraska. Nebraska is not a blue blood program. Or, if it is, the blue blood is based on the family's great great grandfather's textiles company and the fortune has been dwindling. Nebraska is a step down in prominence from Michigan and Ohio State. Nebraska is Iowa and Wisconsin with a better track record. But that record is very old, and from a very different era of college football.