Jump to content
North Side Baseball

jersey cubs fan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    67,901
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    63

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by jersey cubs fan

  1. Oh yes, by all means. Brett wrote a long article that revealed very little, if any new information and therefore we must praise the decision to lose as much as possible for many years. Makes sense.
  2. If it takes 5 years of consistently losing in order to get to a point where you can consistently win, then you aren't consistently winning. http://i.imgur.com/J7BMq.gif Yes, please leave. Or at least stop lying about enjoying a process that somehow requires year after year of losing in order to increase the likelihood of someday winning consistently.
  3. You have fun watching a professional baseball player in the Cubs organization have success. That is not enjoying the process. It would be just as fun watching Javy develop if the Cubs were 81-81 in each of the last three years.
  4. If it takes 5 years of consistently losing in order to get to a point where you can consistently win, then you aren't consistently winning.
  5. I totally get the aspect of it that Theo talked about at some point...that following these guys from day one and then seeing them come together to achieve big league success is going to be really awesome. Like, picturing Javy coming up to the plate in an NLCS game at Wrigley or something after following his minor league career and everything...that's gonna be really cool. I get that. But watching the big team lose in the meanwhile is not fun in any [expletive] way. It will be fun when Javy does something in the NLCS, and slightly more enjoyable because he will have been a Cub since the day he was drafted. But mostly that will be enjoyable because it will be a Cub succeeding in the NLCS. And that still does not in any way reflect rooting for the process itself.
  6. rooting for a process is dumb or a lie people tell themselves, which is just as dumb
  7. Well, it takes you to a pretty dark place once you admit that your owner is mediocre. There's not much that can be done to fix that. So I can actually understand the defensiveness a little. It's not like you can't win titles with a mediocre owner. That's hardly a dark place. Surely it reduces the likelihood of sustained winning. What the hell has Bill Dewitt ever done?
  8. Nothing? Has it gotten better? No. There has been zero effort to making the major league team competitive.
  9. Lake Takes the Plunge This title is a bigger F up than the transposed bb/k numbers.
  10. Well, it takes you to a pretty dark place once you admit that your owner is mediocre. There's not much that can be done to fix that. So I can actually understand the defensiveness a little. It's not like you can't win titles with a mediocre owner. That's hardly a dark place.
  11. It is intellectually dishonest to talk about a collective doom boner on here. I would argue it is aggressively ignorant to talk about it actually. This isn't a group of fans following a good team and unable to enjoy it. This isn't a good team just going through a brief period of struggles. There isn't an unjustified level of fear about the team doing poorly despite evidence pointing toward success. This is a god damn awful baseball team that has been awful for several years and an ownership/management group that has done nothing to make it better. This isn't a farm system competition. This isn't a league that hands out trophies based on rankings of prospects. The only thing that matters is wins and losses by the major league team and this major league team loses far too often to pretend these are good times. Only a truly idiotic person would accuse a Cubs fan of being unfairly critical of what the organization has done.
  12. A season that the Cubs finish at .500 is going to feel a lot different than a season in which they do what they've been doing of late because .500 is going to feel like contention for a good deal of the season.
  13. I briefly explained to my wife how good he could wind up being while watching his HR last night, and she was genuinely impressed. I immediately regretted my decision.
  14. Honestly, I cannot fathom how anyone could come to these conclusions. You must lead a difficult life. Well the first item is essentially a fact so it can't be THAT unfathomable And as always I'll never understand why having a viewpoint on the cubs that is negative speaks to anything about a persons life. It's called "goony money" for a reason Leave me out of this.
  15. I do not understand what they have accomplished in spite of limitations. Kind of a loaded statement. The organization is unequivocally in a better position right now than it was in 2009. Even with the understanding that its easier to build one with high draft picks. None of what has happened did so in spite of limitations. The only thing they did was stop spending and/or concerning themselves with the present. It's the inherited patience of the customer base for the brand that has allowed them to suffer only miniscule short-term financial consequences, something no other pro sports team could absorb so easily. Had the timeframe been shortened, or had they won more games, of if they found an outsized number of hugely valuable pieces via a lower cost than others, that could be impressive. But they've only improved the system with very high picks they got from sucking so bad for multiple years.
  16. I do not understand what they have accomplished in spite of limitations.
  17. It's the NFL, anybody could be a free agent next year.
  18. The Bears want to keep as much of Cutler's cap hit in the current season in order to maintain the ability to cut him after year 3 without taking a hit. That means not going gung ho in free agency this year, but they can still address needs.
  19. But you missed the "unless you're the Cowboys" part. not to dwell on it too much, but i believe that was after he visited Dallas, so my interpretation was that he was saying the Dallas thing went by the boards, so he won't sign anywhere until after the draft. The point that was made was that Dallas has Rod Marinelli who apparently can get the most out of Melton. So, unless you are the Cowboys, there is no point in signing him now. But the Cowboys signed him so the point is moot and your complaint is invalid.
  20. Yeah, this early in the Emery/Trestman era they might as well not blow it on a desperate attempt to turn the defense around in a hurry. Let Trestman/Cutler keep improving the offense, and give Emery the chance to build a stable defense over time that won't hold back an elite offense from winning. The early returns on this era have been good enough to warrant a little patience.
  21. The Raiders signed a lineman, and have not yet revoked his deal.
  22. But you missed the "unless you're the Cowboys" part.
  23. Why is that? We're a long way from Summer. Huh? My theory is, the guy tweeted something to the effect of, "if you aren't the Cowboys you might as well wait until after the draft to sign this guy only if you can't find somebody in the draft." And then he signed the same day, long before post draft time. But since the Cowboys signed him now, the point is moot.
×
×
  • Create New...