The way the system is set-up, the big market teams are making the most money by far thanks to their local TV deals. The comp draft pick is a relatively minor bone to throw to the poors so they will keep playing along with a system rigged heavily to profit the biggest organizations. i'm struggling to understand how the example of getting local broadcast money equates to a "system rigged" in some sense, it's a debate between the haves and the have-more's and #whocares, but if i'm a spender, i'm not particularly inclined to let the non-spenders benefit disproportionately, which i think they are. and not necessarily because of the "competitive balance pick", though that did set off my rant MLB is structured in a way that the owners of the biggest teams have benefited far more, and are in position to benefit far more for the foreseeable future, than the smaller markets. A decade ago there was a strong push to try and spread the profits but in the end all they did was share a little bit and give them a relatively minor thing, the comp draft pick. The big owners don't care about the comp pick. It is meaningless in the grand scheme of their earning hundreds of millions of dollars while the schmoes try and turn relatively minimal profits. It is appeasement so as to keep those schmoes, and some middle market teams on the side of the big guys. You are making a much bigger deal out of the comp pick than any owner. They aren't getting screwed.