The inconsistencies of the rules are what I don't get. I thought he didn't complete the full "process" of the catch because the ball was coming loose just as he got his second step down. They ruled it on the field as an interception, so my interpretation is that you needed indisputable evidence to overturn the call. The more replays that I saw, the more it appeared to me that the initial call was the correct one and that it should've been an INT. Then again, I don't understand what a catch is anymore. Admittedly, I thought that Calvin Johnson rule was a catch, Dez's was a catch, Devonta Freeman's reception last week was a catch, and I thought this was a pick, so what the hell do I know? At this point, I think every NFL officiating crew is guessing with the catch rules. I never bought the "I don't know what a catch is anymore" until they ruled this was a catch. They had gotten fairly consistent ruling that you basically needed to actually catch the ball and keep it for it to be a catch. If nobody caught that ball I guarantee they just rule it incomplete and nothing comes up it.