Jump to content
North Side Baseball

jersey cubs fan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    68,013
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    64

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by jersey cubs fan

  1. He's trying to wear down his arm without pitching so he can get out of there early.
  2. I don't know, but he's plummeting toward DLee pre-2005 status, and that ain't good. Eh, Derrek was a pretty excellent player pre-2005. Eh, not even close. A consistently good on base percentage and 30+ homers? What in the world is wrong with that? He was good, he wasn't excellent, or anywhere close.
  3. I don't know, but he's plummeting toward DLee pre-2005 status, and that ain't good. Eh, Derrek was a pretty excellent player pre-2005. Eh, not even close.
  4. I don't know, but he's plummeting toward DLee pre-2005 status, and that ain't good.
  5. Tony Sopranos' assassin should draw some interest.
  6. I've been. The skanky ho's with daddy issues pull that stuff, not most others. I'm at the beach every weekend in one of the most morally casual places in the country. That stuff doesn't just happen all the time. It only happens with skanks. I guess my friends are skanks then. Those are friends? I thought they were groupies.
  7. Jake here, I forgot how long it's been since I've heard a WGN radio broadcast. Man, Old Style just pisses me off.
  8. I've been. The skanky ho's with daddy issues pull that stuff, not most others. I'm at the beach every weekend in one of the most morally casual places in the country. That stuff doesn't just happen all the time. It only happens with skanks.
  9. The easiest way is to hit the quote button that is on the upper right corner of the post you are quoting.
  10. Theriot has shown that the more he plays the worse he gets. He's been awful for the past week. His May wasn't any better than Izturis's May. Neither player is an everyday shortstop. Each is capable of having semi decent stretches. I think the only hope is to see if Lou can have the magic touch in terms of who he uses. That's a bunch of malarky. Has he been slumping? Yes. Does that mean that he will continue to get worse the more he plays? No. If you were just being colorful in your language then, fine, but otherwise, that's an incredibly unfair and inaccurate statement. The slump he has been in lately has been a bad one, but it doesn't completely discount the rather excellent 200 ABs that came before it. That said, do I want him to be the Cubs starting 2B of the future? No. I think EPatt can be that, if he can handle it defensively, and if not EPatt then DeRosa can do a better job holding it down with Theriot being the supersub until someone better can be produced. Theriot had a nice start to 2007. But look at his May, it's no better than Izturis's and I believe the OBP is even worse. He's been bad for a week. He is not an everyday guy. He's a utility player. Utility players that play everyday see their numbers decline.
  11. I wished they signed him when he was a free agent. I should have been more pro Tejada when trades were discussed, but I'd take him in a heartbeat now. Baltimore's record is no worse than the Cubs, but they are free falling and way out of the race. I can't understand why they wouldn't be up for trading him. Do you really think Peter Angelos would deal that team's only marketable player now that there's competition for fans in the DC area? I don't really think he's all that marketable. We aren't talking Jeter here, let alone Jose Reyes. He's probably less marketable than Soriano. They aren't selling tickets because of Miguel Tejada, #12 in the majors for SS OPS. The team stinks, it's stunk for years. They need an overhaul. Angelos is goofy, so maybe he won't. But the smart thing would be to trade him and try to build a contender for 2009-2012. That's how you sell tickets. And really, are the Nationals that big of a draw that they are taking away ticket sales?
  12. Theriot has shown that the more he plays the worse he gets. He's been awful for the past week. His May wasn't any better than Izturis's May. Neither player is an everyday shortstop. Each is capable of having semi decent stretches. I think the only hope is to see if Lou can have the magic touch in terms of who he uses.
  13. The Cubs have a black hole at SS this year. Last in the NL with an OPS of 555. And before you say Theriot has turned that around, his OPS at SS is 474. Fontenot doesn't play SS. Neither is "good enough" to make this team better. They are 13th in RF and 12th at catcher. The other positions are middle of the road or near the top. The best way to improve this team is to improve the production they get at SS, RF and C. Since it's going to be impossible to improve at C, the choice is finding a real RF or a real SS. They currently do not have either. There is a chance that when all is said and done that a platoon of Floyd and a revitalized Murton will put them at least to middle of the road at RF. As for SS, they basically have zero chance of getting respectable production out of the group they currently have in the fold. But there's no stat to account for Theriot's scrappiness... 8-[ So you would rather have Izturis start over Theriot? I would rather have a real SS. Barring that, the only real option is to try and get the most out of a Izturis/Theriot platoon.
  14. I wished they signed him when he was a free agent. I should have been more pro Tejada when trades were discussed, but I'd take him in a heartbeat now. Baltimore's record is no worse than the Cubs, but they are free falling and way out of the race. I can't understand why they wouldn't be up for trading him.
  15. Isn't he significantly bigger than Peterson?
  16. Are the standings and pitching probables manually updated? I figured that was done automatically somehow. Somebody always posts the previous days' minor league scores and today's matchups. I figure there has to be a way to link those to the front page, no?
  17. That was far from "debunking a myth". Jon gave an alternative explanation for the way those splits broke down(career year in Washington, not very good in Texas, not enough ABs in other spots), but I think that ignores that his spot in the order could very likely be a causal factor in that. After 4 teams in 4 divisions in both leagues, I think it would be foolish to cast it aside altogether. I think it's foolish to pay any attention to it. He's done better in different spots at different points in his career. He's not a leadoff hitter. But he's going to hit leadoff for the next few years until he loses a step and then toward the end of the contract he'll be a 5th hitter. So we might as well get used to it.
  18. That is the big question. They can't go long with Eyre on the roster and a manager who is unwilling to throw him in anything resembling a close game.
  19. The Cubs have a black hole at SS this year. Last in the NL with an OPS of 555. And before you say Theriot has turned that around, his OPS at SS is 474. Fontenot doesn't play SS. Neither is "good enough" to make this team better. They are 13th in RF and 12th at catcher. The other positions are middle of the road or near the top. The best way to improve this team is to improve the production they get at SS, RF and C. Since it's going to be impossible to improve at C, the choice is finding a real RF or a real SS. They currently do not have either. There is a chance that when all is said and done that a platoon of Floyd and a revitalized Murton will put them at least to middle of the road at RF. As for SS, they basically have zero chance of getting respectable production out of the group they currently have in the fold.
  20. I love him at 3rd string and special teams, not as the primary backup.
  21. Every union in the country is anti-testing. The MLBPA is about the strongest union there is. They were not going to allow testing until the public demanded it and congress got involved.
  22. Wrong. Steroids were against the rules, they just didn't have testing. There was no teeth. But the union wouldn't allow any teeth. Selig doesn't have much authority over those people. The owners do. But having authority isn't the same as knowing what was going on and doing something about it. If you work for a large company with offices in several states, and you do drugs, who is most likely to know? The secretary who holds your calls when you are "unavailable", the manager of your location who sees you on a daily basis, or the CEO 1000 miles away? And Bud isn't even a CEO. He's got very limited authority because he's an employee of the owners. People just like ripping on Bud because it's the fashionable thing to rip on leaders. The fact of the matter is Bud couldn't do a damn thing about the steroids problem, and no matter what he does to fix things people are going to criticize him.
  23. But hasn't Seattle killed lefties this year? I thought I heard something about them being 16-3 against lefties. Well, actually they are 6th in OPS overall in the AL, 6th vs lefties and 6th vs righties. The Padres are 13th overall in the NL, but 5th against lefties and 15th against RHP. So yeah, I have to agree. Why not throw Lilly today, then open with Marquis and Zambrano against the Pads with Hill going Sunday. I'm kind of surprised they didn't do anything with the rotation after the back to back super short outings.
×
×
  • Create New...