Jump to content
North Side Baseball

jersey cubs fan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    68,014
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    64

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by jersey cubs fan

  1. I just don't get it. The Cubs had the worst SS production in the NL this year. The worst. Theriot was the SS for the majority of the year, and his numbers at SS almost mirror exactly the poor overall SS numbers by the Cubs. He was awful. Plain and simple. You have to try and improve wherever you can, and this is one of the most glaringly obvious places where that can happen. Meanwhile, some people throw Matt Murton's name out there, even though the guy's numbers dwarf Theriot's, and he actually provides some glimmer of hope for acceptable production. How does this debate exist?
  2. I'm pretty sure he's shocked nobody is clamoring for his services right now. He probably thought he could have had any job he wanted last year. I think he'd take anything at this point.
  3. They probably have no use for him because he stinks. .252/.293/.379 for an OPS+ of 66 in 1000 major league PA. And 815 OPS in AAA (Colorado Springs) is nothing. Cedeno blows that away and is 4 years younger.
  4. Did you consult Dr. Evil when drafting this seriously over-complicated scenario? How about you simply sign A-Rod be done? Ahh, yes. If only "simply signing ARod" would magically create a leadoff hitter for the club, I would be all for it. Leadoff hitter isn't a position, looking for one is a bad idea. Jim has already overpaid for two, I don't want to see him go after another. Simply signing ARod signs any theoretical "problem" of not having a real leadoff hitter.
  5. dusty seems like such a great idea until you actually watch him in action. The funny thing is, he could easily win a World Series with that team, considering the talent makes it a near lock to win 95 games in the regular season. Plus, all their best players are incumbent veterans, and in the AL, he might be convinced not to sac bunt and play small ball nearly as much. Dusty isnt' going to be able to turn them into free swinging hacks. He won't be able to double switch his best hitters out of the lineup. He'll get hammered by his bullpen usage, but if Cashman went out and got him some stable starters, he'd probably ride them all the way to Mo.
  6. Lou is wrong. Very very very wrong.
  7. I never said Theriot was better than DeRosa, what I did say was a interrogative statement asking why one automatically assumes DeRosa instantly gets the job at 2b over Theriot-if Theriot is forced from short that is-without competiton during spring training. Haha, what? And DeRosa should automatically be given the job because he's better than Theriot. The same reason Derrek Lee won't be battling Darryl Ward for the starting 1B job in Spring Training. Did you just compare Lee-Ward and DeRosa-Theriot? I really hope you didn't, I'm disgusted at the comparison. I'm disgusted with the delusion regarding Theriot.
  8. I never said Theriot was better than DeRosa, what I did say was a interrogative statement asking why one automatically assumes DeRosa instantly gets the job at 2b over Theriot-if Theriot is forced from short that is-without competiton during spring training. DeRosa is slated for the job because he's clearly better than Theriot. There's really no question.
  9. Screamin' A thinks Dusty should manage the Yankees next year. NY would eat him alive.
  10. They may or may not start that low, but the only possible way they score "a lot more runs" is if they go out and get a stud somewhere. This lineup is what it is. I really don't understand how anybody could say they were "under productive". They weren't productive because they aren't productive, not because of some fluke. Lee, Soriano and Ramirez are all guys with track records, all guys who performed below expectation and past performance (in the power department) for the vast majority of the season. If someone showed you the team's 2007 power totals before the season, there's no way you would believe it. Sure, the OPS was good for the big three, but the run production wasn't very good due to the relative lack of power. If you can honestly say you think that Soriano and Lee combining for 8 homers and 42 RBI in the first 2 months of the season wasn't a fluke, then you're crazy. And that had a whole lot to do with the Cubs' poor start. Or Ramirez's power disappearing during june, july and august (which have historically been his best power months). No one expected these things to happen, and there's no rational reason to expect them to again. This same group isn't going to score a lot more runs. It would be insane to think so.
  11. FWIW, here is the quality of pitchers faced in AVG/OBP/SLG allowed: Edgar Renteria 0.253/0.337/0.404 Ryan Theriot 0.256/0.335/0.405 Miguel Tejada 0.252/0.330/0.398 can someone expl;ain these numbers? are they saying Theriot compares well to both Renteria and Tejada? It looks to me like they all faced very similar pitching, so the difference in their numbers is a reflection of the hitters.
  12. I haven't read this thread, but it looks to me like some person or persons are trying to argue that Theriot is better than DeRosa. I really hope not. Anyway, 2008 2B belongs to DeRosa, unless the Cubs need to deal him in order to clear some payroll for a significant upgrade elsewhere. Mark is a nice player who is a safe bet to OPS+ around 100 the next two years. But I'd be willing to platoon Theriot and Fontenot at 2B, maybe OPS around 750-780 with an OPS+ between 95-100, if trading DeRosa facilitates a bigger improvement elsewhere. It would be taking a small hit at 2B for what would have to be a huge step forward at SS.
  13. I might watch bits and pieces of each game, but I most likely won't watch any 1 game in its entirety. It's nto out of spite or anything, but I devote enough of my year watching Cubs games that I don't need to set aside 3-7 hours a day watching baseball when the Cubs are done.
  14. Many teams might have a guy like Sean Marshall, but few of those guys have actually had success in the majors. Sean has, and that's a bonus. I disagree with the thinking about Chicago not being a place where guys can continue their peak. Look at Ramirez and Lee, both are better as Cubs than they ever were before. DeRosa had a career year in 2006 and he more or less duplicated that in 2007. Heck, even Jacque Jones had one decent season before reverting back to his subpar ways this year. I do think there is cause for concern with Renteria, only because he's been inconsistent in his career. The thing is though, even if he has an off year, he's going to be a massive improvement over what the Cubs have, barring a complete collapse.
  15. I think only a very limited part of the population is looking to move Ramirez, and selling him short. I don't get the Santana love either.
  16. Did you consult Dr. Evil when drafting this seriously over-complicated scenario? How about you simply sign A-Rod be done? I think I like this plan.
  17. He wasn't ever an easy out? The only position players who averaged less pitches per plate appearance than Theriot were either demoted or traded (Izturis, Moore, Fox). Everybody else saw more pitches than Theriot. Theriot made an out 67 times on the first pitch. 67 times! The only other Cub above 50 is Aramis Ramirez with 57 times. On the second pitch, Theriot made an out 69 times. That's good for 2nd on the team behind Soriano (77 times). On the third pitch, Theriot made an out 90 times. That's good for 2nd on the team again behind Soriano (94 times) Theriot has made the most outs on the first 3 pitches on the team (19 more outs overall than 2nd place Soriano). Soriano also had 42 more overall at-bats then Theriot, so Theriot had a much higher out percentage on the first 3 pitches. The leader in making outs early in the count should never be a non-power hitter, and Theriot is way in front in that category. A non-power hitter should also never see the least number of pitches on the team. He certainly isn't what you described when you said that he was never an easy out. Yes, but since he ran out those ground balls and pop outs, it wasn't easy. They actually had to make the play.
  18. Denver in April probably won't necessarily be that bad. It could be, but it's also been in the 70's in March there. If the Sunday game is a day game, and Monday in San Diego is a night game, it should be relatively ho-hum. They get a day off when the west coast trip ends. Three consecutive Monday off days in June is actually kind of strange I think.
  19. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/cs-071012hawkspulford,0,3451535.story?coll=chi_tab01_layout Dare I say, things are looking up? Pulford reassigned. Perhaps one of the biggest obstacles to improvement on this team for decades.
  20. Cubs, Yankees, Red Sox all make lots of money for others team. Having them play each other kind of cuts into the value.
  21. Ramirez's no trade clause would make it nearly impossible.
  22. especially in a year like this.
  23. hahaha, that is excellent. What is really funny is that Pie seems like a hustly, gritty, BALLPLAYER. Why he is valued so lowly by Whiinhmer and "obviously Lou" while Jones is some kind of winning player is beyond me. Because Pie never played for the Twins.
  24. Pie and Marshall, they could probably get you a pretty good player. But any team that knows the Cubs are choosing Jones and Marquis (and maybe Trachsel) over those two, has to realize the Cubs must think they are both very bad, so not worth much, or that the Cubs are very stupid, so not worth offering much. If you are trading Pie and Marshall, you might as well include Colvin, Murton, Wuertz, Gallagher et al and get yourself somebody like Miguel Cabrera, whose cost is going to go higher and higher.
  25. That's not an interesting article, it's a terrible one. Jones stinks, regardless of his 2nd half average. The past 4 years Jones's OPS+ is 90, 99, 107 and 87. Coming from a 33 (in 2008) year old set to make $5m, that's not anywhere close to a player you need to hold onto.
×
×
  • Create New...