Jump to content
North Side Baseball

jersey cubs fan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    67,894
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    63

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by jersey cubs fan

  1. Is So really Japanese? He's been here for so long I thought he was 3rd of 4th generation.
  2. I don't see anything. I see a guy who is being honest about a disagreement and logically & calmly explaining the basis of that disagreement. He also mentioned he wishes Sanchez well. There's nothing here worth noting, in my view. i don't think that's the proper time and place to express your disagreement with his decision. not to mention saying that guys who come out early fail more often than not. that's my thoughts as well. clearly he's pissed, but that press conference should be more about mark sanchez not the disgruntled coach who disagrees with the decision. i'm also curious to know what carroll found out by talking to nfl people that was ignored by sanchez in making this decision. most of the draft stuff i've read has sanchez as a top 3 quarterback, regardless if he's leaving school early. Yeah, the only thing that would justify his reaction was if he was convinced Sanchez would drop to the 3rd round or something.
  3. If the intention was to trade Marquis to free up money for Peavy, but then they weren't able to get Peavy, Garland could be a fallback.
  4. I don't see anything. I see a guy who is being honest about a disagreement and logically & calmly explaining the basis of that disagreement. He also mentioned he wishes Sanchez well. There's nothing here worth noting, in my view. I think it's absurd that he's talking about him coming out early and going against the NFL's wishes. He's passing on his 5th year of eligibility, is he not? This isn't Maurice Clarett. Leinert stayed forever and that didn't seem to help him at all. He's whining about a kid going pro while standing in front of a sponsors logo.
  5. I'm sure very few would choose to play another year.
  6. I can't imagine the Cubs preferring to have one guy who can backup 1B and one guy who can backup 2B/SS/3B. I just can't imagine this team operating with one backup middle infielder. It's very un Cubs like. Which is why it's possible that we actually might have a 6 man bench this season instead of 5. The only thing more uncubs like would be a 6 man bullpen.
  7. I do not understand how any college athletic department or coach could be upset with a likely 1st round pick forgoing his 5th year of eligibility for the draft.
  8. I can't imagine the Cubs preferring to have one guy who can backup 1B and one guy who can backup 2B/SS/3B. I just can't imagine this team operating with one backup middle infielder. It's very un Cubs like.
  9. What makes you think people believe he's "worth so much." The "awful lot of talent" comment in the original quote. Of course, the author might have been referring to the total amount of talent between the three of them rather than their respective individual talent. Well, it was one commentator's statement about trading three guys that do have considerable talent, but mixed/disappointing major league numbers to date. Not sure how that equates to people believing Cedeno is worth so much.
  10. Dunn = Godfather, Bloomquest = Scarface?
  11. Well he certainly wasn't. I didn't watch the conference but from what I've gathered, Carroll went on about how Sanchez wasn't maximizing the opportunities that he has been given (since he hasn't started much in college so the NFL is guessing as to his ability). He also said that the failure rate was very high for QBs who leave early fail. All right after Mark thanked everyone at USC. Wow, interesting. I never would have pictured Carrol as the type of guy to sabotage his own players' professional aspirations. The whole USC system seems to be about giving us 2 years and then go pro because we're stacked as a mofo. Maybe he's scared to death the Bears will take him and ruin the reputation of all USC QBs. It's not like sticking around helped Leinert at all.
  12. To reallocate payroll to worse players. He trimmed what, 1.5% of the payroll in the deal?
  13. But it's 500k all over the place over several years. If you refuse to supply the back of your roster with cheap players from within your own system, you end up spending millions extra every season, because those guys you pay double for marginal short-term improvements have to be replaced and/or given a raise earlier and more often than the younger players that can do virtually the same thing.
  14. How is he going to develop at the ML level as the 25th man and how much upside does Pie have? He'd be the 5th OF'er and well down Lou's bench depth chart and likely behind a platoon in CF with a manager who feels comfortable using the RH'ed part of that platoon against RH'ers. Pie won't get many ABs with the Cubs, he's done everything he can at AAA, and his potential right now is that of a reserve CF'er, IMO. I don't see him ever developing here at the ML level given the limited opportunities he's going to get and even if he did develop somewhat, his ceiling is likely limited to a reserve role given his flaws at the plate. If there was more reward there, I would agree, but given the poss. marginal improvement of Gathright over Pie compared to poss. marginal improvement of where Pie is at now to a reserve OF'er, give me Gathright and the improvements now. None of this defends your claim that they aren't in the position to allow kids to develop on their 25 man roster.
  15. He's a 37-year old extremely limited defensive player that can't come close to producing the numbers necessary at the positions he's stuck at, 3B and 1B. Teams just aren't throwing money to garbage guys like Aurillia this year. The demand for major league names to fill spots just isn't that high. Why pay a veteran $800,000 to take up at bats that a $400,000 kid who might have a future can do it? In normal times the kid is the better option, in uncertain economic times when tickets haven't even gone on sale yet it's even more of an obvious option. The problem is that we don't have a "kid" that can back up 1B and 3B and hit off the bench. The bolded statement was a general thought about what teams around the league are looking to do in tough economic times.
  16. Seriously, stubborn and unreasonable? That's just ridiculous. Hendry has said he felt the need to trade DeRosa so they could get more lefthanded. The player they brought in to replace him is a switch hitter. The only other bat they've added effectively replaces another LH bat. The only people being unreasonable are those who insist Hendry didn't deal DeRosa in an effort to get more left handed and that the addition of Miles is the only thing he's done to actually get more left handed. It's crystal freaking clear.
  17. Ok, I'll bite. You? No, I said the primary reason for dealing DeRosa was to get more lefthanded. The only way they've done that so far is by adding Miles. Miles was acquired because he could switch hit and is "versatile". So if the Cubs had traded DeRosa but hadn't added Miles, then they wouldn't be more lefthanded? You're not that dumb. Of course they would, by committing more ABs to Fontenot. So I conclude you're simply being stubborn and unreasonable. More Fontenot contributes to it, but he's not going to play that much more. Miles replacing DeRosa is the bigger part of it.
  18. He probably does, Gathright will hit for a better avg., Pie would hit for more power, Gathright is a much better baserunner, Pie is better defensively while both are above avg. defensively. Pie didn't do enough last year to merit being on the 25 man roster and with those flaws I mentioned, I don't see him ever becoming an everyday CF'er. The Cubs aren't in a position to try and develop an inferior player on the 25 man roster (even a 25th man) when they are trying it all and potential upgrades are avail. at minimal cost. I don't get this line of thinking. If anybody can afford to develop guys at the back end of a roster it's a team that should be able to coast to a division title. Almost every single player essentially has to develop in the majors. A team like the Cubs, with very little quality in the minor leagues, is going to depend heavily on whatever they can get from the minors. Every year they are in a position to withstand established veterans having crappy years on the 25-man roster, why can't they deal with a kid who has some upside?
  19. erroneous the question at this point is simply one of Pie v. Gathright. that's it. nobody is arguing Pie is or ever will be a Carl Crawford. nobody. Yeah, not likely ever becoming a solid everyday CF does not make him useless. If you have to go on the free agent market and spend double for essentially the same player, then the guy you have has value. Jacque Jones with a little less power wouldn't have been useless in his 20's. He'd be the quintessential 4th OFer.
  20. Yeah, the logical reason was Dusty Baker freaking abused the crap out of him, the Cubs misdiagnosed him and let him pitch through injuries, make them worse, and creating new ones. agreed! what i'm saying is that his effort/workout regimen/whatever was a contributor to that as well. denying that just blows my mind. It doesn't appear to be that tough of a mind to blow. burn! really guy? Yes, really. You say something stupid, and then insult the people who call you on your stupidity, then act like your baseless reasoning in the only logical explanation, and really, it doesn't say much for your mental accuity.
  21. Yeah, the logical reason was Dusty Baker freaking abused the crap out of him, the Cubs misdiagnosed him and let him pitch through injuries, make them worse, and creating new ones. agreed! what i'm saying is that his effort/workout regimen/whatever was a contributor to that as well. denying that just blows my mind. It doesn't appear to be that tough of a mind to blow.
  22. take a step back. i'm not trying to spin anything. just having a conversation. maybe you're trying to win an argument. if so, okay. kinda strange, but okay. i'm just discussing baseball, the game i love. It's hard to maintain a conversation when you just keep repeating ignorant statements. i'm not opposed to you leaving the discussion if you're having a tough time keeping up. Keeping up with what? Your knuckle dragging idiocy? You have said the same dumb thing over and over, that the reason prior hasn't returned from injury for 5 years is because he hasn't tried to return from injury for 5 years.
  23. Yeah, the logical reason was Dusty Baker freaking abused the crap out of him, the Cubs misdiagnosed him and let him pitch through injuries, make them worse, and creating new ones.
  24. take a step back. i'm not trying to spin anything. just having a conversation. maybe you're trying to win an argument. if so, okay. kinda strange, but okay. i'm just discussing baseball, the game i love. It's hard to maintain a conversation when you just keep repeating ignorant statements.
×
×
  • Create New...