That's great and all, but nobody ever accused the Phillies owners of being overly passionate must win owners, nor would they say that about the Cardinals. There was a time when Peter Angelos competed annually with the Yankees for highest payroll (and actually had the highest) and it did nothing. Steinbrenner is notoriously the most title hungry owner out there, but he spent 2 decades putting out disappointing teams. Sure, it would be great if the owner was committed to winning, but what's more important is they hire the right baseball people to run the operation. These are essentially the same thing, aren't they? No. Putting your money where your mouth is could easily lead to counting on conventional wisdom, treating any prospect as a suspect and trading them for "proven veterans" while spending big on past their prime veterans. A smart baseball person should be able to win big in a relatively cost effective manner, positioning the team to maintain a high level of success year after year, instead of counting on winning now and/or paying for it later. Baltimore showed a tremendous desire to win big, then fell apart as an organization.