I'm not a fan of the players' union, but I wish they would push for more player rights when situations like this occur. It's like MLB is in lock-step with the umpires' union. As somebody who umps very competitive youth baseball I understand the idea that you can get chucked for any arguing of the zone, but sometimes in situations like that on what I'm sure Vanover thought was a border-line call you have to use your judgment and let the guy give off some steam. I wouldn't make a report on a player who barely, incidentally touched me when I made a "borderline" call in his opposition in such a big situation. To be fair though, the rule is in place so umps don't have to/aren't allowed to be subjective on the arguing of balls/strikes. Everyone knows that rule, if you break it you get thrown out. Similarly with having to file a report if there is contact. From what I understand its not the ump to determine if it was incidental or not, but I could be wrong. And on a side note I've really never understood how you get around not arguing balls/strikes. Sure seems to me that theres a lot of bickering when a player is upset with a call and not everyone gets thrown out. A player will comment right after a call and usually get away with it if he handles it well (keep your eyes toward the pitcher while jabbering, keep the words to a minimum, stay in the batters box). A coach can jabber a little as well. The problems come up when the player (batter, catcher or pitcher) makes it obvious he's arguing and delays the game in some way by arguing. Also, when a coach comes out of the dugout to argue a pitch call, or doesn't relent after stating his displeasure. If you bitch at multiple calls, you're gone. But the biggy, I think, is coming out to discuss something else (a close call at first) and then referencing a ball/strike call from earlier in the game.