Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Backtobanks

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    7,298
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Backtobanks

  1. I guess a lot depends on what happens during the next two months, but looking at the available names while adding in the health and cost factor, I think we're better off taking our chances with Gallagher, Lieber, Hill, Marshall, Marquis, and Hart to go along with Zambrano, Lilly, and Dempster. The White Sox probably will be reasonably close at the deadline, but Vasquez would be a perfect fit. Bradley looks like a great fit assuming Edmonds flops and Johnson stays at his earthly numbers, but otherwise I don't see much need for anything else. Of course, everything is subject to change during the next two months.
  2. Your description "impatient, free swinging, and streaky" fits most power hitters. it does???? impatient and free swinging? Top 5 home run hitters in the NL last year: Fielder, Howard, Dunn, Holliday, (t) Berkman, Braun, Cabrera Top 5 home run hitters in the AL last year: A-Rod, Carlos Pena, Ortiz, Thome, (t) Konerko, Morneau of those 13 names, ONE (Braun) can be somewhat accurately described as impatient and free swinging. If "free swinging" means a lot of swings and misses, I stand by my statement. Those 10 hitters have a ton of strikeouts.
  3. Hey, be careful giving credit to Hendry because the Hendry-haters will come after you.
  4. Your description "impatient, free swinging, and streaky" fits most power hitters. Your description "way overpaid" fits 98% of major leaguers. What? Most power hitters are patient, only a handful are free swingers, and very few of them come close to the streakiness of Soriano. Soriano's overpaidness blows away 98% of all other overpaidness. While Soriano may be one of the most overpaid players, power hitters are always at the top when it comes to strikeouts. I will agree that Soriano is more streaky than most, but other HR hitters will slump for a month and then hit 15-18 the next month.
  5. Relative to what, exactly? When the "average" salary is well over $3 million per year and you look at what the "average" player produces, I would say 98% are very overpaid. Mediocre starting pitchers sign for $10 million per year. Teams are locking up their young players who have 1 good year with contracts for $7-$8 million per year for multiple years.
  6. So are we not supposed to not talk about any of the team's success because we are only in mid-May? I would say that a 5-1 record, sub 2.50 ERA and top 20 ranking in Ks is worthy of a little Demp recognition. Great point. If we can't give Dempster some recognition because it's mid-May, then we shouldn't be complaining about Marquis because it's only mid-May. It works both ways.
  7. Your description "impatient, free swinging, and streaky" fits most power hitters. Your description "way overpaid" fits 98% of major leaguers.
  8. The Cubs signed a Korean high school shortstop named Lee Hak-ju. Aaron Shinsano, who works for the Cubs as a scout, says the team believes he'd have been a first round pick in the states.
  9. Found this on someone's blog at Foxsports on trades that he thinks should happen: 1. New York Yankees get Ted Lilly. Chicago Cubs get Hideki Matsui or Bobby Abreu. Why New York does the deal: Kei Igawa is awful, I mean unwatchably awful. Ted Lilly is mediocre at his best but even mediocre is better than awful. Matsui has been one of the Yankees only reliable hitters but the bottom line is that he's a DH on a team with too many DHs. Odds are that list of DHs will grow by one since it's likely that Posada will be back hitting before he's ready to throw, meaning the team will utilize him as their full time DH. That would, in turn, relegate Matsui to a bench role. Matsui has a full no trade clause so the Yankees may use Abreu here instead of Matsui I don't think I would make the deal unless the Cubs can find two reliable starters from Gallagher, Hill, Marquis, Lieber, and Marshall. Lily has pitched better lately and eats a lot of innings.
  10. As long as they're taking the older, lousy former Cubs and not the likes of Cedeno, Gallagher, etc.
  11. Anybody know anything about Chin-Lung Hu? I've read somewhere (can't remember where) that he's pretty much in line to replace Furcal so LA doesn't overpay him. I think that was the plan, but the last thing I read hints that the Dodgers will resign Furcal and use Hu as trade bait.
  12. Let's sign Bonds, trade for Griffey and Dunn, and put Soriano back at 2B. Bonds in LF, Griffey in CF, Dunn in RF, and Soriano at 2B would have to be the worst defensive team in the history of MLB. :lol: :lol: :lol:
  13. If only Cedeno was a lefty. (Where have I heard that before?) ](*,)
  14. Hmmm...interesting trade. I'd like to see how Marshall would do in a starter role first though. Lou doesn't want 3 lefties in the rotation because the NL Central is predominantly right-handed hitters. Of course that's assuming Hill gets back in the rotation.
  15. Cubs get: Kevin Millwood and Milton Bradley Rangers get: Marshall, Murton, Patterson, Marquis, and Veal Cubs get their #2 starter and switch-hitting CF. Rangers get 2 starting pitchers, starting OF, 2 future players, and save a lot of money while getting younger.
  16. That's why people need to be reminded that it is still very early and it's a long season. Not long ago you had players like Cabrera and Tulowitski hitting below .200, teams like the Tigers losing every game and being shut out, and the Orioles in 1st place. When it's all said and done, you can be reasonably sure which teams will be in contention and which players will shine.
  17. Could it be that perhaps people are making ridiculous judgements based on one month of data vs years and years of data? Especially when he did this exact same thing last year. Started fire-hot then cooled off to being neifi-esque. So if Lou is the genius everyone makes him out to be, he can rest Theriot more during the season and if he finally cools off completely, put in Cedeno as the regular SS. Ride the hot bat as long as possible.
  18. The bottom line is that this deal won't happen for one big reason: Lou and Hendry Love Theriot.
  19. Before we go crazy and mess with this team, let's give it a couple of months. Two more months might tell us whether Johnson really is an everyday CF, whether Pie and Cedeno are ready to be stars, whether Greene is really worth giving up that much for, and whether an upgrade at SS is our biggest need at the deadline.
  20. I have no idea why the O's never made that deal. They're going to regret not making that deal. They keep thinking that somebody is going to top the Cubs offer at midseason, but nobody is going to give them a starting SS and 2B (which is what they need). Nobody knows for sure who the 4 players the Cubs offered (supposedly Gallagher, Veal, Cedeno, Ceda), but I'm sure the deal could have been done for Gallagher/Marshall, Cedeno, Patterson, and Veal. That would have netted them a starting SS, a starting pitcher, a possible starting 2B, and a future starting pitcher. Really stupid on their part.
  21. From MLBtraderumors: Rangers Expected To Be Sellers At 7-15, the Rangers have the worst record in the American League. Team president Nolan Ryan doesn't seem ready for a fire sale yet, but you have to figure the Rangers will be clear sellers come June. Joel Sherman of the New York Post recently suggested Kevin Millwood, Vicente Padilla, Hank Blalock, Frank Catalanotto, and Milton Bradley as trade candidates. As Sherman says, Millwood could be a hot commodity. He looks healthy and would certainly help a contender. Gerald Laird, Marlon Byrd, Jamey Wright, and Joaquin Benoit could also be dealt. The Rangers already have the fourth-best farm system in baseball according to Baseball America; Jon Daniels' team could climb even higher with another bountiful July. Forget Marlon Byrd. How about picking up Millwood and/or Bradley. Millwood is signed through 2010 ($8.5, $11, $12), but there's a club option after 2009 based on innings pitched. We know Bradley is crazier than a loon, but he can hit from both sides and play all 3 positions. How about Marshall, Murton, and Patterson as a starting point for Millwood and Bradley.
  22. >.353/.451/.618/1.069 is not pretty solid for a catcher, it is amazing for an positional player.
  23. There goes the chances of trading____________(fill in a relief pitcher's name) for Jay Bruce.
  24. It might not be a bad trade when you consider the production out of a Drew/Johnson or Drew/DeRosa platoon in LF. Of course, we might be kicking ourselves when Soriano gets into his streak and starts hitting HRs everyday.
  25. Burnett (if healthy) seems like the most obvious target since there's a good chance the Jays will be out of it by July. The question is whether they would take prospects. Oswalt would be fantastic, but I can't see the Astros dealing him to the Cubs. To get Lincecum, the Cubs would really have to overwhelm the Giants, but they do have the prospects to offer. I don't think Penny or Lowe will be available because the Dodgers will be contending in the West. To me Blanton isn't a sure solid #2 or #3 starter and the cost of dealing with Beane would be prohibitive. Dan Plesac (Comcast sports) suggested that the Cubs might have the solid starter they need sitting in their bullpen........Jon Lieber. I certainly would turn to Lieber over getting fleeced by Beane for Blanton.
×
×
  • Create New...