I think the only question is the fanbase. The Cubs might decide that the hit to the fanbase from keeping Zambrano is worth more to them than the amount that Z can give you on the field. Otherwise there's no reason why they couldn't make up again. Wow. That's some opinion. I'll join in the throngs of people who disagree 100% with this. To quote Charlie Sheen, "winning". That's what its about. San Francisco obviously had no fans when Barry was carrying the team. Nobody cares too much about character in team sports. They will forgive anything if the bad characters are producing. Sammy was beloved when he was good. And he was hated when he sucked. To think that keeping Zambrano would lose fans is absolutely untrue. And to bring up the Pacers analogy is also wrong. The Pacers have sucked for a long time. Ron Artest had nothing to do with them losing fans. Sorry. So the implication is they care about character in individual sports? Would Tiger Woods have as many fans today if he started dominating again? Especially among women? Multiple people have given testimonies of people leaving because of character concerns some even while their team was still winning. To dismiss that would require calling all of them liars. Is there any proof that they are lying? I've said and will continue to say that winning is by far the biggest factor in attendance in pro sports. That doesn't mean there are not other factors that contribute. To say there's no point of no return (to extend it out to the absurd, would people really support a team full of murderers) is hard for me to swallow. Now, the argument that what Z did is minor enough that it will not break that point for more than a negligible amount of fans, that argument I can buy. First off, golf is an individual sport. A golfer being an a$$ is a little more difficult to overlook. Second, look at the ratings when Tiger Woods plays golf. Even when he's not winning. Multiple people leaving teams due to character issues? I've never met any person who's even claimed this. That's crazy. There are examples all over of athletes with "character" issues who are worshiped because they are good. Kobe Bryant, Michael Jordan, Barry Bonds, ARod, Mike Vick. So a couple people claim they no longer like a team because of "character". If you say so. I've never seen it. But 99.9% don't. As sports fans, we are loyal to teams. And as for the individual player who pisses us off, usually it's because they perform badly. Look at all the rants on this message board about Soriano, or any of the many players who suck. He dogs it every single day. Doesn't even look like he's trying. Nobody stops rooting for the team because of him or anyone else. And Soriano would be the biggest hero in the city if he hit a World Series winning home run. If people want to view their athletes as role models and moral beings, then that's their prerogative. But most people don't. Ron Mexico is a bad example.