I dont know...4th smallest market in baseball and even if the Cardinals payroll was at 120 million, he'd make up 25% of their payroll. I realize that they operate and produce revenues that a mid-market club would, but thats only 15 million less than what the Cubs are spending this year. I personally think they would have a hard time fielding a competitive team with a $30 million player on the payroll. There's a big gap between $30 million and $21 million. Just that they'd be that far apart from what the greatest hitter of all time is asking for, a guy who came up in their own system, is laughable. I mean, he's already getting $16 million this year, so it's not like they have to look at $27-30 million like it's coming out of nowhere. It would push their projected 2011 payroll of about $95 million to $109 million. OK, so he makes up a huge chunk of their payroll...HE'S ALBERT [expletive] PUJOLS. He's going to, and should, make up a giant chunk of any team's payroll. I can't tell if it's cheapness or stupidity (like the Loshe contract), but it's sure amazing to watch. Aren't they usually in the top 10 of baseball revenues each year and making around $200 million? The Cardinals, while #4 in attendance last season, had the 13th highest payroll (lower even than Detroit, Minnesota, and Seattle). Had Albert Pujols made $30 million in 2010 (instead of $15 million) their payroll would've been the 7th highest in baseball, just slightly ahead of the White Sox but still $14 million behind Detroit at #6. I don't think adding an additional $15 million to the payroll (which is what his contract would have done) would "handcuff" a team that draws tons of fans and sells tons of merchandise.