It doesn't bother me that Lebron chose to go to Miami. If what mattered the most to him, and the only thing that mattered at all, was to win a championship, then I think he (maybe only short term, who knows, though they are spending their money well even after the big 3 contracts) made the right choice. We could hem and haw and say that Chicago is a better destination given the youth and role players, but its certainly up for debate. Isn't he showing even more selflessness in the goal of winning by intentionally taking second or third banana status, AND taking less money? I dunno, I just don't see the arguments here. Why should he intentionally choose to join an inferior team and lift them up? Kobe had absolutely stacked teams for all of his championships, and the few times when his talent wasn't up to par he flat out didn't make the playoffs. He's still talked about as one of the greatest of all time. It just doesn't make sense to me. Though Lebron could make his legend anywhere, he still can make himself one of the greatest ever if they do some ridiculous things and win 70+ games and become repeat champions. Now I don't agree with the way he left at all, and it certainly left a sour taste in everyone's collective mouths, but I don't disagree with his decision. If I were in his shoes I'd also would have whittled it down to Miami and Chicago. Those gave me the best options to win immediately and win long term. I had my doubts with how much money Miami would have left to sign roleplayers but they're already making splashes with Mike Miller and Haslem and possibly Big Z. If they get ANYTHING from their roleplayers they'll steamroll the Eastern Conference. It remains to be seen what will happen, but it sure will be an exciting season. Lets all hope a new CBA gets negotiated quickly, I've never been more excited in the NBA since I was 10 years old.