Really? You don't think anybody thought there was a significant chance that Soriano would be completely unproductive over large stretches of his contract? Yes' date=' really. EVERYONE knows that Alfonso Soriano is a streaky hitter at best. In my opinion, streaky does not equate to "futile," like I originally stated. "Futile" is how I would describe Soriano's 2009 season. Let me define what I meant - and it is not that Soriano would be completely unproductive over large stretches of his contract. I don't think anyone really thought that his "streakiness" would basically stretch over a total season, as it basically has in 2009. I think we all expected hot streaks and cold streaks. That is how Soriano has been in his career, and we all know/knew it. So, NO, I don't think that many people thought that Soriano would be this terrible for a season. I don't think that he would have received that kind of contract if it was expected for him to be such an offensive/defensive liability. It seems like Soriano is more concerned with his little stupid "bunny hop" before catching a fly ball, or hitting a home run and doing his cute little WWE "you can't see me" hand thing in front of his face - which is altogether as annoying as watching his teammates getting walked to load the bases in order to face him as an easy out. You really thought that Soriano would have a year where he basically was cold with only two week long hot streaks? Hmmmm.