I'd call his 2003 great, without question. Not down in history great, but great nonetheless. As great as Zambrano last year. zambrano wasnt great last year either imo. we must have a different opinion on what "great" means. i look at some of the years pedro, maddux, clemens, johnson & sanatana have had and woods 2003 just looks like a very average year that a good pitcher would have. not a great year by any stretch imo. So by your definition, there's about 1 great pitcher per year. i wouldn't say only one but most years have a few guys who have great years. i just dont consider a 3.20 era and 14 wins a great year. Why are you listing win totals? This is a silly arguement. You guys are arguing about ONE (nsbb member) person's view on the word "great". It's a complete waste of time. Now let's talk about Wood! Wood's great, yay!!