Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Rob

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    15,338
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

 Content Type 

Profiles

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Trade & Free Agent Rumors

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospect Rankings

Chicago Cubs News, Rumors & Analysis

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Chicago Cubs Fan Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Rob

  1. Except for Kenny Lofton. And Mark Grudzelaniek. And the 04 version of CPatt. And Mark Bellhorn (2002). And Eric Young (2000)
  2. Personally, my vote would go to Beltran or Cabrera... similar stats at harder defensive positions... much moreso with Beltran. At any rate, Ryan Howard sure is looking like I got a steal... drafting him in the 14th round of our fantasy league.
  3. That's how I feel-if Pierre was the worst problem, we'd have a pretty good team-hopefully we don't re-sign him for big money, but there's other areas that need to be fixed first. The problem is, if he re-signs, it will be for big money. And that money then cannot be used to fix the myriad of other problems we've got. Is he our biggest problem? No. Can he keep us from solving the big ones? Yes.
  4. Except for Kenny Lofton. And Mark Grudzelaniek. And the 04 version of CPatt.
  5. CERA is considered to be nothing more than a junk stat. I know that. And it's primarily considered a junk stat because there's practically no evidence that a catcher's game calling has any impact on pitching success. (For instance, last year the situation I describe above was reversed. Blanco had a much better CERA than Barrett.) Since the autocorrelation of the stat is lousy (at best), it's considered to be a junk stat. However, if Barrett's game calling was indeed hurting our pitching staff's success, as the original post posits, then Barrett's CERA would be consistently higher than Blanco's. Which it isn't. So I'm saying there's no real evidence that Barrett's game calling or defense hurts our pitching. And his offense certainly helps when compared to Blanco's or just about any other NL catcher. Don't get me wrong, I love Barrett. Having Barrett behind the plate instead of a guy like A.J. Pierzynski is like having Bill Hall instead of Yuniesky Betancourt. It should be a no-brainer.
  6. I can't figure out for the life of me why we let Williams slip away for nothing... and why we picked up yet another live arm for Nevin instead of a position prospect, which our farm system would be sorely in need of. Hendry needs to go.
  7. CERA is considered to be nothing more than a junk stat.
  8. Only Harben I know of is Adam Harben... of the Twins. Stats!
  9. Perhaps not, but I'd certainly expect a sub 5 ERA from our newly dubbed #3 starter, and Meche can't be even close to a guarantee for that. Let's lay out his abilities here, shall we? His strikeout rate comes in around 40% of the league average. His walk rate at around 20%. And to top it all off, his GB/FB ratio is pretty weak. He could be perfectly serviceable in a sizeable ballpark with a decent defense... but a high walk rate at Wrigley field? All his flyballs would be zooming right out of the park. Wrigley needs groundball pitchers, or at least pitchers that don't have high walk rates. Meche isn't either of those things.
  10. If Gil Meche is considered an integral part of the rotation, we aren't competing.
  11. I know you're being sarcastic, but Christ, who didn't besides Aramis? Pagan had an absolutely stellar one. Dopirak's was pretty darn good too, IIRC.
  12. Am I the only one still on the Fredi Gonzalez BandWGN? After him, I'd be all about Girardi though. Oh, and a quick question... does anybody know what Earl Weaver is up to these days?
  13. Somebody sure is reaching for something to pad the resume...
  14. That's assuming we actually got replacement level production in his place. And since the primary beneficiary of the injury was Neifi, with Walker moving over to first base... it's quite possible we didn't get replacement level production from either position. While I haven't looked at the numbers yet, I'd be quite surprised if the tandem proved to be above replacement level as a whole.
  15. If we're listing Jeter, why aren't we paying any attention to Tejada? His stats are almost exactly the same... a little lighter on the OBP and AVG, but a good deal higher on SLG. And for that matter Carlos Guillen has numbers that are just about the same. I'm sorry, but I don't believe there's any way Hafner doesn't deserve the award this year... and if it's not him, it's Manny or Mauer.
  16. Why are we adding guys like Walrond and O'Malley to the 40 man? I swear, if we get raped in the Rule V again, I'm gonna be livid. These guys better get DFA'd after the season.
  17. I was just about to point that out.
  18. This season was secured for Webb when the DBacks acquired Orlando Hudson. The day that happened, Webb jumped to the top of my pitching draft chart.
  19. It's so depressing that this didn't shock me into a sense of outrage and disbelief...
  20. That's just not true. The Cubs have promoted plenty of guys to the next level without any semblence of success behind them. Perhaps I should clarify... In the farm systems of teams that have a clue, age relative to level is worth looking at.
  21. What makes a good prospect? As far as I'm concerned... being young for the league might be the most important indicator. It indicates plenty of past success, or else, hey... you wouldn't have been put in that league. At the same time, it also allows the player the most time to develop... whether at the same level or at the major league level. Players like Delmon Young, who can more than hold their own against AAA pitching at age 20... it's just hard to find players like that who never manage to pan out. But you'll find plenty of guys like Kevin Orie who were old for the leagues, mashed, but never could figure it out when they finally had to face harder pitching and face a fairly strict timetable for breaking into the league.
  22. Money still talks in this game. We would have to overpay. If the Muts offered 14/season the Cubs would have to offer 16-17/season. What other choice do the Cubs have at this point? Hendry has put the Cubs in this position. Now going into 2007 the Cubs have a gaping whole in that rotation. I would rather overpay with $$$$ than prospects(see the Juan Pierre trade) Actually, you'd only have to offer another penny... If memory serves me correctly, in an open bidding war... no Boras client has ever signed with the team that offered less money.
  23. Agree completely. CLee will be grossly overpaid and Murt is already looking like a cheap and effective #2 hitter. Soriano would be most welcome at 2B but unfortunately Jim will want a ballcatcher there. I'm just hoping Jim will be captivated by Soriano's basestealing. He seems to value that sort of thing. Sort of his ignorance clouding his bad judgement?
  24. I doubt we could get much from the Phillies for Pierre... at least not enough to offset the two comp picks we can get for offering him arbitration this offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...