Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Rob

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    15,269

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Rob

  1. Rob
    In 2003, Prior ranked #2 in QS% among pitchers with a minimum of 100 IP... .01 points behind Kevin Brown. Either he had his best stuff every day, or he managed to deal with it pretty damn well when he didn't, and he started getting hit.
  2. Rob
    Cuse, c'mon man... stop while you have your dignity. We all respect your opinion most of the time, but you're over-stepping here.
  3. Rob
    I just wish John Kruk would have been busted... Maybe that would've killed his BBTN career.
  4. Rob
    great stuff, really. you think the reason his era with men on base is higher than his era with the bases empty is because...there's men on base?? that's like saying he gives up more grand slams when the bases are loaded than he does when the bases are empty or he gives up more stolen bases when there's guys on base. average against with men on base: .228 average against with the bases empty: .239 Numbers don't tell the whole story. They tell more of it than simple selective perception.
  5. Rob
    Damn. If I knew he was that cheap, I would have actually supported him over Theriot. ...and I think I just felt my soul leave my body.
  6. Rob
    Ouch. Sorry Raisin and MurtonFan... your lives are now forfeit.
  7. Rob
    Even if that's why they did take it for injury recovery, does that make it less of a baseball sin? I don't care why they took it. It helped them "perform"...whether it was for strength or for injury recovery. I think it's a lesser evil, personally. I can understand doing whatever it takes to be able to get back to your previous levels when they have been unfairly ripped away from you do to some freak occurance. Creating a new level for yourself at the expense of others is a bit more selfish.
  8. Rob
    I'd bet CT's life that Kevin Brown was a juicer. I'd be CT's life on 17 in roulette. Sucks to be you if you'd be CT''s life. You're one to talk, Mr. 10CT's.
  9. Rob
    I read his book. It didn't exactly reek of credibility.
  10. Rob
    I'd bet CT's life that Kevin Brown was a juicer. I'll see CT's life and raise you MurtonFan's. Edit: Forgot, I can't raise less than you opened with. I'll throw in Raisin too. Sweet, my life is worth more than CT or Murton's! How do you figure? Let's base all off the scores off the value of CT's life. We'll call that 100CT. Maybe MurtonFan is 95CT and you help cover the gap by being worth 10CT yourself. :lol:
  11. Rob
    Yeah, that's the list that's been floating around all morning. I'm not sure I buy it, considering how it's not really in alphabetical order, and you've got Troy Glaus showing up twice there.
  12. Rob
    Not in the least. MILB testing is much more stringent than MLB testing, and besides, most of the sources for the investigation would have no connection to him. We aren't really getting a list updated through the end of last year...
  13. Rob
    I'd bet CT's life that Kevin Brown was a juicer. I'll see CT's life and raise you MurtonFan's. Edit: Forgot, I can't raise less than you opened with. I'll throw in Raisin too.
  14. Rob
    Wow... I suppose this is support for my "start Cedeno" and "we need a new backup C" arguments I'd been making.
  15. Rob
    Theriot looked good defensively when he got his hands on the ball. But because his arm is so weak, he was playing in a few steps, which comprimised his range considerably. All in all, he was below average with the glove, simply because he could never get to the ball. Everett shouldn't have to compete, he'd be hands-down a much better option than Theriot. Yes, he should have to compete. If he is much better than Theriot (and I think he is) it would be evident from the competition. Would it? I'm not comfortable choosing a starting player based off a few spring training games. Obviously, if Everett lost a bunch of range and it showed from April through May, we can consider going in another direction... but Theriot isn't close enough right now to warrant leaving it up to chance.
  16. Rob
    Ok, first off, let's throw out that ridiculous mental toughness shtick. Nobody in here is out on the mound with him, so let's not pretend we know what's going on. Secondly, how do you figure those comparisons besides a lefty with a good curve? At any rate, Hill's value is likely going to go up as his strikeout rate catches up to his minor league rate. Third, of our main 4 starters (Z, Lilly, Hill, and Marquis), Hill threw the next-to-least number of pitches per plate appearance. Only Marquis threw fewer per at bat. And Finally, Hill had a significantly lower than league average BB/9. I just can't figure out your logic behind these thoughts.
  17. Rob
    Theriot looked good defensively when he got his hands on the ball. But because his arm is so weak, he was playing in a few steps, which comprimised his range considerably. All in all, he was below average with the glove, simply because he could never get to the ball. Everett shouldn't have to compete, he'd be hands-down a much better option than Theriot.
  18. Rob
    To be fair, Everett might be the single player in the game with a glove good enough to cover up for his offense... at least among people with truly putrid bats.
  19. Rob
    From what I have read he will not be healthy until mid-season. Then I would expect him to be very rusty and most likely not of much use to the major league team this season. If he wouldn't agree to a contract with a club option for next year then he can walk after this season anyway. So from the Cubs perspective they pay him a pretty good salary for another year just to get him rehabbed so he can cash in as a free agent in '09. If he would not take the two year contract then I can see why the organization decided it was better to cut him loose now. I would be very surprised if whatever team he signs with does not either get a two year deal (or one year with a team option for '09) or pays a lower amount in a one year deal than what the Cubs could have forced him to take. A rusty Mark Prior is still better than the back end of our rotation right now. Even if he only pitched half of August and Sept, he'd be well worth the money (which wouldn't be all that much).
  20. Rob
    There was no logic good enough to justify this decision. This is Jim Hendry being childish and making his decisions based on emotion rather than logic.
  21. Rob
    The Cubs have been shopping him hard the last couple of weeks. If they can get anything at all for him, they'll deal him before the deadline. Teams are much less likely to offer anything for him when they think he might come without a prospect cost a couple weeks later. If anything, tendering him a contract should bring his value up.
  22. Rob
    Just for fun... Murton's career line vs. LHP: .326/.399/.510 Scott's career line vs. RHP: .276/.364/.534 Yeah, that'd be a ridiculously good platoon.
  23. Rob
    In other words, he's not saying he's going to non-tender him, simply so that there's that bit of doubt that causes a GM to actually hand over a crappy prospect for him.
  24. Rob
    Rowand's OPS+ the last five years. 102 130 93 86 123 Rowand isn't even a great bet to be an above average hitter. And while he certainly hustles on defense, he's only above average with the glove... nothing special. Rowand is league average... him getting five years, and getting 12 mil per year, are both absolutely ridiculous.
  25. Rob
    Trading or non-tendering Prior would be quite stupid. He's still expected to pitch next season, and we could certainly use a #5 starter of his caliber late in the season. His value in that role is worth the salary for this season, and trading him for next-to-nothing or non-tendering him for the salary relief isn't likely at all to be of any use to us. If getting rid of him gives you some sort of perverse emotional gratification, congratulations. But there is no good reason to be rid of him from a logical standpoint... unless you honestly believe he'll fake being injured the entire season in order to avoid pitching.
×
×
  • Create New...