Lofton: 2005 - .335/.392/.420 2006 - .301/.360/.403 2007 - .296/.367/.414 Figgins: 2005 - .290/.352/.397 2006 - .267/.336/.376 2007 - .330/.393/.432 Lofton has been better than Figgins in almost every season except the last one, where Figgins managed to hit nearly 40 points higher than his career average based on a small sample size fluke due to missing a good chunk of the year. At age 29, Figgins isn't just hitting his stride, he's about to start his decline because his speed is gonna start to slip. Besides, he's still only under control for two years anyways. And despite what you think of Murton, Cedeno, Veal, and the rest, we would be much better served to go after an upgrade where it's not really up for debate if he's better than a cheap one-year stopgap. Shouldn't we be using those people where it can make the biggest difference to our team? Getting a real shortstop would help this team more than getting what (if you are correct) would be a marginal upgrade over a freely available centerfield option... and it wouldn't stop us from acquiring that centerfield option. Getting Figgins would stop us from making a deal that could help a lot more.