Obviously the article makes the case that there is more quality, generally speaking, among football announcers. I don't know if that's really true or not, since I'm not a big football watcher . . . But partly, I feel, I DO think football analysts are better, because they always teach me more. Frankly, there's very little that the average baseball analyst ever adds to my baseball knowledge base -- I honestly already know so much that their meager attempts at depth aren't good enough, whereas my average-ish football knowledge allows me to be taught and impressed more easily.