It is over the top because I think that he let his rage get the best of his nuance to express that rage. Someone mentioned a few pages ago that if this was David Backes there would be few, if any, Hawks fans taking a "wait for the facts" approach. So there is absolutely bias there. Where he loses me is that "wait for the facts" does not equal "The victim is a big faker, liar, gold digger". At least for me it means that I hold out hope that it didn't really happen because the alternative is horrible. But the odds are against Kane being innocent. That he might get away with it makes me sick. That we'll never completely know what happened means I will never look at him the same way again.