I don't think anyone here has anything against spending money to win, but when it's rumored that you're going to give a guy like Furcal almost double a contract that people were saying is far too much, it kind of makes you think. If true, that $50 million could be much better used for extentions to Prior, Zambrano, Lee, Aramis, etc, and some of it could be used to bring in other talented ballplayers. Why blow your whole wad with one guy when you can take that money and bring in 2 or 3 very good players? Simply spending money is not what it takes to win. It's how you spend it and who you spend it on that makes the difference. And I'll tell you right now, if we give Furcal 6/100, then nobody in management has a damned clue as to what is going on, and we won't win anything this year or the next, or the next, because we'll have so much damned money tied up in a B-level player.