well there haven't been that many commissioners, so let's take a look back: kenesaw mountain landis - did a lot to help the game grow, including getting rid of all the gambling scandals and the brawls that were commonplace in the teens. but doesn't he have to lose a lot of points for being the primary force that kept blacks out of the game for 25 years? happy chandler - only served 6 years; was a progressive commissioner who favored players' rights and integration, so of course the old racist owners got rid of him ASAP ford frick - he was pretty good. before his time as commissioner, he was one of the main forces behind the creation of a hall of fame in the 1930s. he was also adamantly pro-integration, though the pioneers broke into the game before he was commissioner. he also helped baseball grow as teams moved to the west coast, there were good decisions made as far as expansion, and baseball became a fixture on television. william eckert - the unknown soldier. hadn't seen a game in person for 10 years preceding his appointment. only served three years, and was forced out because the owners figured he'd have no ability to handle the impending labor trouble. suffice it to say, this was not one of the more inspired choices for commissioner. bowie kuhn - fairly similar to selig, i would guess. the game grew significantly during his tenure, both in terms of attendance and tv revenue, and players were a lot better off when he left than when he started. but he was kind of a prick, tried to get jim bouton to retract ball four, suspended some players for dubious "transgressions." all in all, he was good for the future of the game, though rather awkward and ham-handed in his rulings. peter ueberroth - was a good businessman and the profitability of the game improved greatly during his five years. on the down side, he was notorious for allowing collusion among owners when it came to free agency. a. bartlett giamatti - only served six months before passing away. fay vincent - no. draw your own conclusions. selig hasn't been the worst, i'm pretty positive of that, and he's among the better half of commissioners at the very least. the game has certainly grown with him as commissioner, and i don't think anyone could say that selig does not love the game of baseball. there are some big negatives - the 1994 playoffs being wiped out, and the blind eye to steroids being the most egregious. but it's not like richard justice is the only person who things that selig has been the best commissioner; the official historian of MLB feels the same way.