Complete this Analogy (re: Lou Holtz)

[Derwood]

Tough one, right?

[vance_the_cubs_fan]

I think all the choices up there are better baseball analysists than Holtz is a football one.

 

A trained chimp would be a better choice.

[Marco4]

Trained?

 

Note - I don't know the guy, but the joke stands.

[cubweiser03]

I cant believe im going to say this but.....i miss trev alberts. As opinionated as he was at least i could understand him. Lou comes in from leftfield way to much.

 

Harold reynolds makes me laugh. I laugh at lou holtz.

[Andy]

Obvious choice is Joe Morgan. Holtz is blatantly partisan towards ND, Morgan is blatantly partisan towards Bonds. You can't understand Lou because of his lisp, you can't understand Morgan because of his ludicrous statements. It's like they're one and the same.

[imb]

Id say he's like the John Morgruk.

[ConstableRabbit]

I said Morgan also because both are often regarded as the "face" of the analysts in their respectivt sports, as much as many fans dislike each of them.

[Transmogrified Tiger]

Both offer no analysis and have a frightening hatred for actual facts.

[ConstableRabbit]

Both offer no analysis and have a frightening hatred for actual facts.

 

:lol: :lol:

[CubinNY]

I said Harold Reynolds because the both talk as if they have marbles in thier mouths.

[Derwood]

Both offer no analysis and have a frightening hatred for actual facts.

 

It's really true. Holtz doesn't watch the games he talks about. And if you ever read any of Morgan's ESPN chat transcripts, he constantly makes excuses for why he doesn't watch any of the games he isn't working. Plus Morgan hates sabermetrics, OBP, and anything vaguely related to Billy Beane.