Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Old-Timey Member
Posted

Being reading and hearing Seth Jones and Bowen Byram in the same sentence. Don't think Byram can be as worthless and bad as Jones but, to be already mentioned in such comparisons is concerning.

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Just now, gflore34 said:

Being reading and hearing Seth Jones and Bowen Byram in the same sentence. Don't think Byram can be as worthless and bad as Jones but, to be already mentioned in such comparisons is concerning.

Still don't know why Jones turned into a pumpkin the second he left Columbus, especially considering he begged off the Blue Jackets to begin with

Old-Timey Member
Posted
1 minute ago, Derwood said:

Still don't know why Jones turned into a pumpkin the second he left Columbus, especially considering he begged off the Blue Jackets to begin with

Yeah, I didn't get the lack of effort and just flat out dogging it.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
12 minutes ago, gflore34 said:

Yeah, I didn't get the lack of effort and just flat out dogging it.

Maybe he thought Columbus was bad but then realized the problem was him, not the team? Chicago not any better for him?

Posted

Seth Jones was and is fine. 
 

the problem was trying to make him the savior of a dying dynasty and then him being on a compete dumpster fire of a team 

Posted
3 minutes ago, jersey cubs fan said:

Seth Jones was and is fine. 
 

the problem was trying to make him the savior of a dying dynasty and then him being on a compete dumpster fire of a team 

Which very well could end up being the same issue with Byram, who should be fine but probably should not be treated like a #1 D with a $12m contract for a team lacking star player at F.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
4 minutes ago, jersey cubs fan said:

Seth Jones was and is fine. 
 

the problem was trying to make him the savior of a dying dynasty and then him being on a compete dumpster fire of a team 

His +/- on Chicago is brutal. A basic, not very analytical stat, sure, but it points to how awful those teams were

Old-Timey Member
Posted
20 hours ago, NorthsideAvenger said:

Buccigross reporting San Jose offered 9, 27 and a prospect.

 

WTF??????

  • Like 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, Old Style said:

WTF??????

Supposedly #5  pick was also on the table. If all of this is true, then Byram's market was very hot. Would I still make that particular trade for him? No. It's good to know that KD was NOT the only GM being overly aggressive about Byram. 

  • Like 1
Old-Timey Member
Posted
21 minutes ago, NorthsideAvenger said:

Supposedly #5  pick was also on the table. If all of this is true, then Byram's market was very hot. Would I still make that particular trade for him? No. It's good to know that KD was NOT the only GM being overly aggressive about Byram. 

yeah this makes me feel slightly better

Posted

If Buffalo ends up dealing 4 for Knies or Stenberg drops there I’m gonna be furious. 
 

Rumors about Robertson and others are probably smoke but the trade he made does mean Davidson has to be more IN on the present day than ever. You can’t trade for and presumably sign a (we are praying) 1D and then not also try and get better up front. If he’s done stockpiling 1s, then go ahead and deal all three next year for something good. Sign Bedard, Byram and the new guy to big deals and you have your core, with a bunch of cheap talent around them for two years. Figure out who to keep later. 

Posted (edited)
52 minutes ago, jersey cubs fan said:

If Buffalo ends up dealing 4 for Knies or Stenberg drops there I’m gonna be furious.

Supposedly Toronto was asking for 4, Frondell+ for Knies. If Buffalo gives up less than that for Knies, then yeah I will be furious.

-------

As for Jason Robertson, SEA was given permission to talk to him and they made an 8 year offer. Robertson turned them down. St. Louis also made an offer and supposedly Robertson won't even consider signing with the Blues. 

Edited by NorthsideAvenger
Posted
8 minutes ago, Wilson A2000 said:

IMG_6635.jpeg

Sure they needed to take some steps. But it’s not just out of town people ripping the deal. This is such typical parochial BS from Chicago guys. The value transaction is just so way off. They gave up draft capital and D depth and now they are also forced to give #1 Dman money to a guy who has never shown an ability to be one. Byram could run the power play but you do not want him on the PK. He was the 4th option there in Buffalo and he’s going to be thrust into top 2 in Chicago where Connor Murphy and Louis Crevier are now gone after eating so much of that time.
 

It could eventually work out but Davidson painted himself into this corner because he’s spent so much draft capital on guys who “should” be that #1 who are also nowhere close to it. He’s used 4 first round picks (three of them top ten) on D and they still have a need for more. 
 

They also still don’t have a legit top 6 forward grouping. They need Byram to do more than he’s ever done plus they need multiple forward prospects to take big leaps this season, or they will be right back to one of the teams hoping for lottery luck. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, 17 Seconds said:

6/75 for Byram

12+ aav for a second pairing defenseman from a team that won one round of playoffs. Highest paid D in the league (for now). 
 

unbelievable asset management silliness by Kyle. 
 

have to assume Bedard soars past this number. 

Posted
1 hour ago, jersey cubs fan said:

12+ aav for a second pairing defenseman from a team that won one round of playoffs. Highest paid D in the league (for now). 
 

unbelievable asset management silliness by Kyle. 
 

have to assume Bedard soars past this number. 

Time will tell. Bowen was only a 2nd pairing because there were two pretty dang good guys in front of him in Buffalo. With that said, he has a chance to prove he is a legit 1D, if he can't, he will probably get KD fired. 

Posted

I just don't get how you trade #4 and don't get Bedard any help on his wing.  He is the centerpiece of this whole organization and he's had to center a bunch of 3rd/4th line guys (Burakovsky, Donato, Bertuzzi, etc.) and/or young dudes with what's probably a 2nd line ceiling (Nazar, Lardis, etc.)

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Montreal extends Ivan Demidov to 8 year and 9.5m aav, another reminder of the missteps along the way in Davidsons plan. Arty’s inability to show signs of improvement is a major factor why they made such a bad trade and contract for Byram. 
 

Ivan would easily be the second best forward on the Blackhawks.

 

see also Nico Hischier, a proven top 6 center and captain signing for fewer years and lower AAV than the unproven Byram. 

Edited by jersey cubs fan
Posted

Mikheyev signs 4 years under 4m aav. 
Hawks get a 4th line penalty killing forward Cole Smith for 3/3aav. 
also Ian Cole 1/4, who’s a LH penalty killing D.

 

they have a plethora of LHD and only 2 RHD. Byram is probably going to be on his off hand. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...